Employee Losing Labor Code Claims in Arbitration Has No Standing to Pursue PAGA Representative Action

robot
Abstract generation in progress

A recent California Court of Appeal decision, Sorokunov v. NetApp, Inc., ruled that an employee who lost individual Labor Code claims in arbitration cannot subsequently pursue a PAGA representative action based on the same alleged violations. The court found that issue preclusion applied, stripping the employee of PAGA standing when the underlying Labor Code violations were determined not to exist in arbitration. This ruling suggests that successful defense against Labor Code claims in arbitration can prevent their re-litigation under PAGA, and also offers guidance on the enforceability of arbitration agreements with modification clauses.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin