On February 27, news reports stated that Sam Bankman-Fried, who is serving time for the FTX collapse case, recently posted on social platform X, publicly supporting the proposed CLARITY Act, calling it “an important milestone in the crypto space” and attributing it to Trump’s policy push. This statement quickly sparked a backlash in U.S. politics.
Sam Bankman-Fried said that he had advocated for similar legislation before his indictment, aiming to limit the regulatory authority of former Gary Gensler. He also hinted that regulatory actions are related to political factors, once again touching on whether his case is subject to political interference.
Responses from both parties were very direct. Cynthia Lummis pointed out that some “try to seek amnesty” without realizing that the CLARITY Act could lead to harsher legal consequences. She emphasized that her push for crypto market structure reform is entirely different from the lobbying efforts in 2022 and straightforwardly stated that she does not need the other’s endorsement.
Elizabeth Warren also warned that Sam Bankman-Fried’s support itself is a risk signal. She reiterated that crypto regulation legislation must focus on investor protection and financial stability, not on relaxing enforcement boundaries.
Amid the ongoing fallout from FTX’s multi-billion dollar bankruptcy, discussions around the regulatory framework for the crypto market in the U.S. are becoming increasingly intense. The CLARITY Act, as a potential reform plan for the crypto market structure, is caught in highly politicized battles. Sam Bankman-Fried’s comments not only failed to reshape his image but also made the legislative environment for the bill more complicated.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Social media platform X submits remedial measures to the European Commission regarding blue verification mark issues
Elon Musk's social media platform X submitted a remediation plan under pressure from the European Commission, following a €120 million fine for violations including "blue badge certification" issues. The EU pointed out problems including X's paid verification, insufficient advertising transparency, and non-compliant data access.
GateNews7h ago
Bank–Crypto Clash Slows Senate Clarity Act Progress
Dispute over stablecoin reward programs between banks and crypto firms has slowed progress on the Senate Clarity Act.
Banks warn rewards could trigger deposit flight, while crypto advocates say evidence of major shifts is limited.
Lawmakers including Sens. Alsobrooks and Tillis are
CryptoFrontNews7h ago
Bitcoin Policy Institute calls for revising U.S. tax rules that currently treat all BTC payments as capital gains
Gate News reports that on March 13, the Bitcoin Policy Institute called for modifications to current U.S. tax rules. Under existing regulations, all payments made using BTC are treated as capital gains transactions, requiring the payment of corresponding taxes. The institute argues that this regulation limits the practical application of Bitcoin as a means of payment.
GateNews9h ago
The first list of "Stablecoin Licenses" in Hong Kong is about to be announced! Rumors suggest they will go to HSBC, Standard Chartered, and OSL.
Hong Kong's first batch of "Stablecoin Issuer License" list will be announced next week. The three main applicants are HSBC, Standard Chartered Bank, and virtual asset platform OSL. This licensing round may favor banks due to their capital strength and regulatory advantages, while OSL possesses rich practical experience. Although rumors suggest the main list is finalized, the actual situation may still change.
区块客10h ago
