2025-12-15 22:20:41

U.S. Cryptocurrency Regulation Has New Developments. The SEC Cryptocurrency Working Group held a Financial Monitoring and Privacy Roundtable on December 16, starting promptly at 1:00 PM Eastern Time. While the agenda of this meeting seems routine, it actually touches on the most core issues of the entire crypto industry.

To put it simply, this is an impossible multiple-choice question. Regulators need financial monitoring to prevent money laundering and risks—that's the bottom line, no debate. But the fundamental attribute of crypto technology is privacy protection, which users and project teams consider more important than anything else. Both sides have valid points, and neither wants to compromise, making coordination a problem.

How much influence does the SEC have in this matter? Very significant. As the core regulatory body in U.S. finance, SEC decisions often set the tone for the global crypto market. This roundtable isn't just a simple exchange of opinions; it could directly influence the regulatory framework in the coming years. Countries around the world are watching the U.S. stance, and the future of industry compliance largely depends on the tone set by this meeting.

Currently, the global crypto regulation environment is generally tightening. Europe has MiCA, Singapore and Hong Kong are refining their frameworks, and as the largest market, the U.S. cannot remain idle. The SEC’s proposed plan may serve as a template for other countries to reference, or at least be included in their considerations.

For the industry, the biggest variable is whether this balance point can be found. If regulators propose overly strict measures, it could stifle some innovative products; if too lax, it may fail to prevent risks. Industry practitioners are closely watching subsequent developments, because once new regulations are finalized, they will need to reassess whether their projects and operations can continue.

Balancing monitoring and privacy is easier to talk about than to implement. But the outcome of this meeting is likely to send a clear signal to the entire industry: the way forward.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

26 Likes

Reward
26
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ZenChainWalker

· 2025-12-18 21:57

Once again, the same old issue: monitoring vs. privacy. To put it simply, how many can you have both fish and bear paws? Betting on the SEC this time, the news will be big but the results will be underwhelming. In the end, most will probably settle for a compromise plan.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanPhantom

· 2025-12-17 07:40

Here comes the old routine of regulation and privacy again. Every time they say it will have far-reaching impacts, but when will we actually see some action? Honestly, the SEC folks are just gambling. If they crack down too hard, who would dare to build? If they loosen up too much, it just makes them look useless. It seems that the final compromise will still be the old, tired KYC approach. Don’t expect any innovation.

View OriginalReply0

TradFiRefugee

· 2025-12-16 16:19

Regulations are tightening again, it feels like privacy is about to be sacrificed. Here comes that old trick again, surveillance vs. privacy, and in the end, the common people will definitely suffer. The SEC is really controlling the entire industry, one word and the whole world follows suit. How can this balance be found? Someone will definitely get cut. Damn it, now they have to assess whether projects can still run, so annoying.

View OriginalReply0

DaoTherapy

· 2025-12-15 22:50

Monitoring vs Privacy, this question is really a tough one; you can't offend either side. What will the SEC come up with this time? Honestly, it's a bit uncertain. Balancing anti-money laundering measures and privacy protection—can we really have both? The whole world is watching the US move; we're just waiting to be affected. Too strict, killing innovation; too lenient, bringing risks—it's really hard to strike a balance. I wonder how many project teams are trembling right now. Europe's MiCA is already paving the way; the US won't let regulation go out of control. Honestly, it all depends on the tone set by this meeting; many people's futures are at stake.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMaximalist

· 2025-12-15 22:49

monitoring vs privacy is literally the impossible trinity of crypto rn... sec's gonna set the precedent whether they realize it or not, and honestly? most projects aren't sophisticated enough to navigate whatever framework comes out of this. network effects will determine who survives the compliance arbitrage

Reply0

ShadowStaker

· 2025-12-15 22:48

nah the real question is whether they'll actually enforce whatever framework they cook up or just use it as a compliance theater prop... we've seen this movie before lol

Reply0

GraphGuru

· 2025-12-15 22:46

Here we go again, the old script of regulation and privacy. Whoever makes concessions loses. However, if the SEC can really find a balance this time, other regulatory agencies worldwide will likely follow suit. Whether our project survives depends on this step. Too strict stifles innovation, too lenient brings risks. I just want to see what the final outcome will be.

View OriginalReply0

gaslight_gasfeez

· 2025-12-15 22:40

The SEC is up to its old tricks again. Honestly, they just want to collect money and pretend to be clean—impossible, brothers. When regulation tightens, innovation is doomed. In the end, retail investors are the ones who suffer. Privacy and surveillance are like fish and bear paws; why choose one? Just ban both, and it'll be much simpler. This roundtable is just a formality; the decision has already been made. We can't guess it. The whole world is watching the US. It's hilarious—just for the SEC's sake, they have to change the framework. The project teams are desperate to survive, while regulators want to kill innovation. Watching this show is really exhausting. Instead of focusing on the meetings, better see which coins are going to be called out. If regulations are too strict, prices will plummet; if too loose, who will take the blame? Balancing both is impossible. If this meeting really produces results, I’ll live stream myself eating my phone.

View OriginalReply0

Ser_APY_2000

· 2025-12-15 22:35

Here we go again, already setting the tone so quickly? It seems like the US just wants to use this opportunity to regulate global crypto, and other countries will have to follow suit.

View OriginalReply0