2025-12-16 01:32:13

This scheme is more reasonably designed. The fee flow directly refunds to the project itself, while allowing token holders to also earn rewards, creating a positive cycle. In comparison, some projects allocate fees to partners, but the latter do not actively claim this income, which wastes the mechanism that could nourish the ecosystem. A good fee structure can motivate ecosystem participants to support the project's development.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

fren_with_benefits

· 2025-12-18 15:26

Yes, yes, yes, this is the proper logic. A closed-loop fee design can truly save an ecosystem.

View OriginalReply0

ColdWalletGuardian

· 2025-12-16 10:31

Fee recirculation project + holder dividends, this logic is indeed clear. Just worried that the partner might be the kind of "I don't want to" awkward situation again.

View OriginalReply0

ShibaSunglasses

· 2025-12-16 01:52

Wow, this is the way it should be, otherwise it would be a waste.

View OriginalReply0

UncommonNPC

· 2025-12-16 01:49

Really, this kind of self-sustaining design is the way to go, unlike some projects that just give out tokens to partners and call it a day.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 2025-12-16 01:43

This design is truly excellent, giving a sense of mutual benefit. Without free riders, the ecosystem can only survive. It's way better than projects where fees are just distributed and then nothing happens. Positive cycle vs. cutting leeks, it's clear at a glance. Holders can really enjoy the benefits, and the project isn't bleeding out. Smart solutions should be designed like this.

View OriginalReply0

DefiEngineerJack

· 2025-12-16 01:42

ngl, this fee mechanism actually makes sense on paper... but has anyone done the math on incentive alignment under different market conditions? because i've seen plenty of "circular economy" designs collapse the moment liquidity dries up. showing me the formal verification or it's just vibes

Reply0