2025-12-16 10:43:51

Bitcoin tonight remains the same old pattern. The range between 86,500 and 85,500 is oscillating back and forth, nothing new. Want to push upward? No chance unless it breaks above the upper boundary of 86,500. Want to explore downward? The 85,000 level has been pierced twice, each time bouncing back — but that doesn't mean the bottom is there.

This sideways consolidation is the most annoying. If it could really hit a new high, that would be fine, but the problem is that nothing is breaking out. Persisting like this in the long term actually increases the likelihood of testing lower levels.

From a trading perspective, tonight you can short within the 86,500 to 87,500 range, targeting the lower levels at 85,000 and 84,100. #加密生态动态追踪 $BTC $BNB these assets tend to move in tandem, so pay attention to risk levels.

BTC1,18%

ETH0,39%

BNB0,87%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
1
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-e56dabd4

· 2025-12-16 10:56

#Crypto Ecosystem Dynamic Tracking Bitcoin remains the same tonight. It oscillates repeatedly between 86,500 and 85,500, with nothing new. Want to push upward? No chance unless it breaks through the upper boundary of 86,500. Want to explore downward? The 85,000 level has been pierced twice, each time rebounding— but that doesn't mean the bottom is there. This sideways pattern is the most annoying. If it could really hit a new high, that would be fine, but the problem is it can't break out of anything. Persisting like this in the long term actually increases the possibility of testing lower levels. From a trading perspective, tonight you can short within the 86,500 to 87,500 range, targeting the lower levels of 85,000 and 84,100. $BTC $ETH $BNB these assets are correlated; pay attention to risk levels.

View OriginalReply0