2025-12-16 11:28:38

Comparing token supplies across major platforms paints an interesting picture. Amazon has 10.8 billion shares outstanding, while Google stands at 12.1 billion. By contrast, Internet Computer's circulating supply sits at just 543 million $ICP—orders of magnitude smaller.

This scarcity dynamic opens up deflationary potential for ICP. With a constrained supply and growing ecosystem adoption, the token mechanics could shift favorably over time.

What really sets Internet Computer apart isn't just tokenomics though. The network distinguishes itself as genuinely unhackable and unstoppable—a rare claim in blockchain, but one backed by its architecture. That combination of limited supply and robust security infrastructure creates a compelling case for long-term value.

ICP5,31%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Rugpull幸存者

· 2025-12-19 11:19

ICP supply is indeed quite scarce and interesting, but I've heard "unhackable" so many times haha --- The supply comparison with Amazon and Google is interesting, but I still reserve judgment on the security claims --- The scarcity angle is well played, but I don't know how long it can last --- Can it really deflate, or is it just another marketing story --- Talking about being unhackable isn't enough; we need to see if the ecosystem can really take off --- Small numbers do look appealing, but I'm worried it's just an illusion --- I've heard this logic countless times, but what’s the result

View OriginalReply0

GamefiHarvester

· 2025-12-19 02:06

A supply of 543 million is indeed scarce, but why does the phrase "truly unhackable" sound so familiar? --- ICP's narrative has always been like this—claiming to be the next big thing every time, suggesting that low supply can lead to price increases? Then why is it still here? --- Lack of supply doesn't necessarily mean prices will go up, everyone. Can we be a bit more sophisticated with this logic? --- Unhackable and unstoppable? Ha, I’m waiting for the day to prove that wrong. --- Scarcity of supply + security assurances sound impressive, but in reality... Is the adoption rate of the ecosystem really growing? --- Here we go again with tokenomics salvation theories. Wake up, everyone. --- A circulating supply of 543M is indeed much less than AMZN and Google, but they are top global companies—what are we comparing to? --- There are many chains that are supposedly "unhackable," but what happened to all of them? They disappeared. --- Instead of just looking at supply, why not focus on what the real dapp ecosystem is doing? --- The word "unhackable" is overused; every project claims to be like that.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoDouble-O-Seven

· 2025-12-18 22:05

543 million ICP compared to billions of shares, the scarcity really makes a difference --- unhackable? I'm tired of hearing this word, let's see if the follow-up can live up to it --- Small supply is one thing, but I'm worried that no one will use the ecosystem --- Long-term value is a common phrase in Web3, but the key is actual application --- Large gap + strong security = a value hotspot? Just listen and wait --- The story of ICP sounds good, but the ones that really make money are never about scarcity

View OriginalReply0

PumpStrategist

· 2025-12-16 11:58

543M in circulation compared to Amazon's 10.8 billion—this number game is pretty impressive. But that term "unhackable"... it sounds to me like a déjà vu from 2017.

View OriginalReply0

ser_we_are_early

· 2025-12-16 11:55

Is the ICP supply so limited? Compared to Amazon and Google, it's indeed a big deal... But I've heard the "unbreakable" claim too many times. Can you really trust it?

View OriginalReply0

RektDetective

· 2025-12-16 11:31

543m of supply is indeed scarce, but I've heard the word "unhackable" too many times... --- The story of ICP sounds good, but I don't know how long it can hold this time. --- I just want to ask, since it's so scarce, why hasn't the price gone up yet? --- The supply comparison is indeed exaggerated, but security promises are always the easiest to break. --- Deflationary mechanics sound great, but it depends on whether the actual adoption can keep up with the hype. --- I'm a bit tempted, but "unhackable" is usually a flag in crypto... --- Scarcity does have some value, but with such impressive architecture, why isn't it more popular? --- I've seen all the pitfalls of fundraising; is this time really different? --- Limited supply is an advantage, but it takes real users to make a difference. --- Long-term optimistic, but be cautious of the recent tricks to harvest profits.

View OriginalReply0