Source: CryptoNewsNet
Original Title: ‘This Is Not Journalism’: Ripple CEO Takes Aim at NYT
Original Link:
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has criticized the New York Times over a recent “hit piece” targeting the new administration of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
He believes the article constructs a false narrative about why the SEC is dropping crypto cases.
The NYT frames the SEC’s retreat as political favoritism, but Garlinghouse argues that the retreat is actually a necessary correction of an “illegal” and legally unsound enforcement strategy pursued by former Chair Gary Gensler.
The Ripple boss has specifically criticized the NYT for omitting key context regarding federal judges who slammed the SEC’s behavior during the previous administration. This refers to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling, where judges called the SEC’s denial of a Bitcoin ETF “arbitrary and capricious.” In the Debt Box case, a federal judge sanctioned the SEC for making “materially false and misleading representations.”
“This is not journalism. This is actively advancing a false and failed narrative,” Garlinghouse said.
Crypto Dementia
Other industry voices like the chief legal officer at a certain compliance platform and the head of firmwide research at Galaxy Digital have also criticized the prominent media outlet over the recent article.
They argue that the article’s headline and tone imply corruption, yet the reporters openly admit they found no proof of it. If there is no evidence of pressure or influence, they argue, then the narrative of political favoritism is fabricated.
Some analysts claim that the Times is relying on the Gell-Mann amnesia effect, meaning that the readers are too uninformed to realize that the previous administration’s behavior was the actual anomaly. The previous strategy was legally and politically unsustainable, with critics accusing the NYT of prompting “crypto dementia.”
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
'This Is Not Journalism': Ripple CEO Takes Aim at NYT
Source: CryptoNewsNet Original Title: ‘This Is Not Journalism’: Ripple CEO Takes Aim at NYT Original Link: Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has criticized the New York Times over a recent “hit piece” targeting the new administration of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
He believes the article constructs a false narrative about why the SEC is dropping crypto cases.
The NYT frames the SEC’s retreat as political favoritism, but Garlinghouse argues that the retreat is actually a necessary correction of an “illegal” and legally unsound enforcement strategy pursued by former Chair Gary Gensler.
The Ripple boss has specifically criticized the NYT for omitting key context regarding federal judges who slammed the SEC’s behavior during the previous administration. This refers to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling, where judges called the SEC’s denial of a Bitcoin ETF “arbitrary and capricious.” In the Debt Box case, a federal judge sanctioned the SEC for making “materially false and misleading representations.”
“This is not journalism. This is actively advancing a false and failed narrative,” Garlinghouse said.
Crypto Dementia
Other industry voices like the chief legal officer at a certain compliance platform and the head of firmwide research at Galaxy Digital have also criticized the prominent media outlet over the recent article.
They argue that the article’s headline and tone imply corruption, yet the reporters openly admit they found no proof of it. If there is no evidence of pressure or influence, they argue, then the narrative of political favoritism is fabricated.
Some analysts claim that the Times is relying on the Gell-Mann amnesia effect, meaning that the readers are too uninformed to realize that the previous administration’s behavior was the actual anomaly. The previous strategy was legally and politically unsustainable, with critics accusing the NYT of prompting “crypto dementia.”