A netizen mentioned an interesting phenomenon in a discussion: a trader's account showed abnormal data — an actual liquidation loss of 10,000 USDT, but the system instead refunded 100,000 USDT. This numerical discrepancy naturally raises questions.
Such situations are not isolated in the trading market. We often see similar discussions: liquidation compensation, system anomalies, refund mechanisms, and so on. It's hard not to consider the underlying rationale — what is the normal risk control logic, how are refund rules formulated, and are these transparent and verifiable?
The exchange's compensation mechanisms and risk management approaches indeed warrant careful scrutiny by market participants. After all, involving real money, any abnormal data could reflect certain issues in the system's operation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BoredApeResistance
· 2025-12-20 00:51
Is this exchange experiencing a major system issue, or is it deliberately pumping liquidity to attract attention?
Losing 10,000 and getting back 100,000—I've seen this script before. Next, they'll freeze accounts and claim risk control anomalies.
Wait, has this really happened? I need to find out which exchange it was so I don't get scammed.
Honestly, these incidents are happening more and more. Who still trusts those compensation mechanisms?
Is the refund policy transparent? Ha, that word is just a joke in the crypto world.
But on the other hand, can a liquidation really come with such benefits? I've never experienced it myself. Or is it only certain accounts that get this treatment?
View OriginalReply0
PerpetualLonger
· 2025-12-20 00:05
Wow, is this really true? Exploding to 10,000 and earning 100,000? Why am I not this lucky, going all-in every day and getting harvested instead, with the bears taking my hard-earned money?
They say it's a system glitch, but I think it's just the market manipulators testing the waters. This kind of loophole is definitely intentional, waiting to cut off retail investors like us.
Forget it, keep adding to the position. It's a bottom-fishing opportunity, everyone. This time, I will definitely break even. This is the last time, really.
View OriginalReply0
On-ChainDiver
· 2025-12-17 03:55
Can losing 10,000 turn into a 100,000 cashback? Isn't this just the exchange giving you benefits? We don't dare to ask 🤐
---
What kind of risk control logic is that? It feels like a BUG. If you hit it, you better withdraw quickly and run.
---
I've seen this kind of thing several times. Someone really made a profit from such a discrepancy, but later their account was frozen. Can you believe it?
---
Transparent and verifiable? Ha, the exchange's rules are the truth they set. What else are you expecting?
---
Speaking of which, losing money can actually earn rebates. The market's gameplay is getting more and more outrageous.
---
One possibility is that the system malfunctioned when copying orders, which then resulted in tenfold rebates.
---
People trying to make quick money with this mechanism will eventually have to pay it back. I bet five bucks that it will be recovered later.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyUpOnly
· 2025-12-17 03:51
Oh wow, these numbers don't add up, and I actually earned nine thousand more? There's too much suspicion involved.
A system bug this outrageous? I'm going to wash up and go to sleep; only in my dreams would I see such good fortune.
It's opaque, and we don't even know how the rules are set. Who would dare to trade with confidence like this?
Even in liquidation, there's still reverse compensation. I really can't understand this logic. Has anyone actually looked into it thoroughly?
Someone should have properly investigated the risk control mechanisms of these exchanges long ago.
Wait, could this be some kind of bait, to lure people in and then cut their losses?
When it comes to real money, even a single anomaly can ruin someone. This is way too reckless.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfer
· 2025-12-17 03:49
Losing 10,000 to make 100,000? Where does this exchange get such a thrill? Feels off
The system is so generous that I'm actually scared... Is this really true?
Can you recover and get compensation after a liquidation? Feels easier than making money from trading
I can't trust this transparency... There must be a trap somewhere
100,000 USDT? If this was really that good, someone would have already exploited it to death
A netizen mentioned an interesting phenomenon in a discussion: a trader's account showed abnormal data — an actual liquidation loss of 10,000 USDT, but the system instead refunded 100,000 USDT. This numerical discrepancy naturally raises questions.
Such situations are not isolated in the trading market. We often see similar discussions: liquidation compensation, system anomalies, refund mechanisms, and so on. It's hard not to consider the underlying rationale — what is the normal risk control logic, how are refund rules formulated, and are these transparent and verifiable?
The exchange's compensation mechanisms and risk management approaches indeed warrant careful scrutiny by market participants. After all, involving real money, any abnormal data could reflect certain issues in the system's operation.