2025-12-17 15:21:30

#数字资产市场洞察 SOL's recent trend has indeed brought considerable gains to friends who are following along. According to the technical analysis conducted tonight as expected, it has already smoothly reached the second key resistance level, and the profit potential is quite good.

If you are also paying attention to this wave of $SOL, you are in luck. However, some friends are still not very familiar with technical analysis or are unsure about the specific timing of operations. In such cases, more communication and learning can help you improve gradually.

The crypto market changes rapidly, and mastering the rhythm is very important. If you're interested in the future direction of SOL, you can continue to follow the latest updates.

SOL1,52%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StakeWhisperer

· 2025-12-17 20:49

Bro, you really caught this wave of SOL well. The key is to see clearly how the next rhythm will go. It's too late to jump in now; whether you want to make up for it depends on the risk. Technical analysis, to be honest, still relies on intuition. I didn't expect it to break resistance so smoothly. What will happen next? Compared to old veterans like me, you young people react faster. To be honest, I'm still exploring the technical side. Sometimes charts can be quite deceptive.

View OriginalReply0

ArbitrageBot

· 2025-12-17 20:29

Starting to hype SOL again. Sounds good, but how much of this rally is due to your own orders?

View OriginalReply0

ser_we_are_ngmi

· 2025-12-17 15:33

Oh no, it's this kind of "I saw it coming a long time ago" after-the-fact armchair analysis again. Why not give an early warning? When SOL rises, you come and talk about technical analysis; what about when it falls?

View OriginalReply0