2025-12-18 05:50:09

#大户持仓动态 I recently looked into Bitroot's technical solution, and honestly, I was a bit shocked. The Graphene protocol can achieve a 10:1 transaction compression ratio, what does that mean? Tasks that previously required ten transactions can now be completed with one. Millisecond-level propagation speed makes value transfer truly borderless.

What's even more interesting is their Pipeline BFT consensus mechanism. Many say decentralization and stability are like fish and bear paws, but this scheme seems to want both. In new scenarios like AI+Crypto or social applications, being fast and stable at the same time is indeed a challenge.

To put it simply, the greatest significance of technological progress is not bragging, but enabling more people to use good tools. Every code iteration is polishing this possibility. Prosperity on the chain doesn't appear out of thin air; it's backed by this step-by-step persistence. Looking at this trend, the ceiling for blockchain efficiency might be higher than we imagine.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ReverseTrendSister

· 2025-12-20 22:59

Compressing this data at 10:1 sounds a bit虚, can it actually run stably? --- It's another case of achieving decentralization and stability simultaneously. I've heard this kind of talk too many times. --- Pipeline BFT is indeed innovative, but why do social applications have to go on-chain? Is it really necessary? --- What’s the use of millisecond-level propagation? On-chain, the liquidity issues still haven't been solved. --- Code iteration sounds good, but practical implementation is the key. What are Bitroot's current application scenarios? --- I've heard a thousand and eight hundred times that the ceiling is higher than expected. Let's wait until activity picks up. --- Turning ten transactions into one sounds great, but can transaction fees really be lowered? Or is it another cutthroat method?

View OriginalReply0

TestnetFreeloader

· 2025-12-20 21:42

A 10:1 compression ratio is a bit aggressive; we need to see real-world testing data to judge. Pipeline BFT sounds promising, but whether it will perform well in practice remains to be seen. This kind of technological iteration is indeed worth looking forward to, but it depends on whether the ecosystem can keep up. Wait, when exactly will the Bitroot solution be implemented? Just talking about the architecture isn't enough. Where is the balance point between fish and bear's paw? I always feel like there's a discount involved.

View OriginalReply0

Degen4Breakfast

· 2025-12-18 06:20

10:1 compression sounds fierce, but the real test is how long it can last once implemented. Milliseconds-level dissemination, I've heard similar promises before... The biggest fear is that it will underperform once it goes live on the mainnet. Pipeline BFT sounds good, but decentralization and TPS have always been a trade-off, unless the laws of physics change someday. Code iteration really isn't something to boast about; as long as it works, that's what matters. As for the ceiling, I think as long as there are no major failures this round, it's a win haha. If this technology is really so powerful, why haven't we seen major applications follow up? The combination of social apps + Crypto—haven't we already stepped on many pitfalls before? Honestly, it's still about waiting for mainnet data; empty talk is meaningless.

View OriginalReply0

StableGenius

· 2025-12-18 06:19

10:1 compression sounds nice on paper, but let me explain why that's not the flex everyone thinks it is

Reply0

not_your_keys

· 2025-12-18 06:17

10:1 compression? Sounds awesome, but can these data really be implemented? Well said, but can social apps really sustain? Let's wait and see. Great technology, but the key is whether people will use it. Otherwise, no matter how fast, it's useless. If this consensus mechanism is really so powerful, why haven't I heard of more applications adopting it? Can you have your cake and eat it too? I think there's probably some trade-offs involved. But I have to admit, this direction does have a lot of potential, much better than just hype. The question is, when will we see real data? Anyone can talk about it on paper.

View OriginalReply0

LuckyBearDrawer

· 2025-12-18 06:04

A 10:1 compression ratio sounds good, but can it really stay stable? Oh, yeah, the contradiction between decentralization and high speed is indeed hard to resolve. Bitroot really left me stumped this time. Code iterations keep piling up, but in the end, it still depends on whether the ecosystem is willing to buy in. Feels like it's about to be hyped up again. Let's wait and see the actual implementation before making judgments. The term "ceiling" has been overused; let's survive the next bear market first before hyping it up.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 2025-12-18 05:51

10:1 compression? Sounds good, but let's see when it actually goes live. I've seen too many technical solutions fail. --- Pipeline BFT sounds promising, but I really don't understand how they balance decentralization and speed. --- Here we go again with the hype about the ceiling. It feels like they're constantly breaking new ceilings, but why is it still so laggy? --- Code iteration is indeed important, but what about the ecosystem users? What's the use of just being fast? --- Millisecond-level propagation? I still have to wait when I transfer funds. I don't believe this setup. --- The name Graphene Protocol sounds pretty impressive. Are there real-world cases or is it just talk? --- This is true technical accumulation, unlike some projects that only know how to do marketing.

View OriginalReply0