Recently, a friend shared their crypto asset allocation plan. They invested a total of over 100,000 yuan in several new coin launch projects, with the following allocation strategy:
THQ and the new coin portfolio combined 5,000 USDT and 2,500 USDT, MemeMax_Fi followed with 4,000 USDT, Theo allocated 1,000 USDT, cysic invested 1,300 USDT, and beld finally allocated 2,000 USDT.
It seems the strategy is to diversify risk across several early-stage projects, with THQ taking the largest share as the core position, while the other projects are small-scale follow investments. This kind of new coin launch allocation is still quite a common approach nowadays—after identifying promising new projects, investors allocate funds in batches according to their risk preferences.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SigmaBrain
· 2025-12-20 14:05
My friend, this configuration is solid, but I'm just worried that new coins might underperform.
It's all about whether THQ can carry the team; everything else is just supporting roles.
Putting $5,000 on THQ—this guy really believes in it.
Launching a new coin is like this: either zero or ten times the return. Hope we don't get caught in a rug pull.
I can't see any innovative points in this diversification... just conventional operations.
Adding new coins to the THQ portfolio feels like going all-in on a specific track.
Theo is only a thousand USD? Is it because he's not interested or due to risk considerations?
The question is whether these projects can survive the next bull market—who knows?
The configuration is actually quite balanced; it's just about making accurate bets.
Can MemeMax double in value? That's the real core.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecovery
· 2025-12-18 09:21
lmao mate, "risk diversification" across five shitcoins is just fancy wording for "i have no clue what i'm doing but at least i'm spreading the pain evenly"
Reply0
HappyToBeDumped
· 2025-12-18 09:12
Friend, with this setup… THQ still makes up the majority, but it's hard to tell if it's profitable. All these are new coins, what can they rely on to make money?
The new coin playing method is like this; retail investors will never catch up with the early wave of dividends.
With over 100,000 points spread out like this, it feels like it’s better to go all in on one?
Why is it always this kind of "balanced setup," and in the end, no one makes any money?
I haven't heard of these new coins… but the community's popularity is pretty good.
Early-stage projects are so risky; does diversification really reduce risk, or is it just relying on luck?
View OriginalReply0
fren_with_benefits
· 2025-12-18 09:05
Friend, this configuration... Does THQ really weigh so heavily? I'm a bit nervous.
---
Investing in new projects is really a gamble on luck. Diversified setups are smart but also split the profits, a dilemma.
---
A position of 5000 USDT in this industry is nothing... I'll wait until Bitcoin stabilizes before moving.
---
I've never even heard of MemeMax. Is your friend brave enough to go so aggressive?
---
This setup is actually quite standard; it all depends on whether these upcoming projects can survive for more than two months.
---
Only 1300 USDT for cysic? Seems like I don't really rate this project.
---
Spreading 100,000 yuan like this, even if one project blows up, it won't hurt much. The strategy is sound.
---
I haven't done any homework on Theo and cysic. Can someone explain their narratives?
---
Small investments feel comfortable; it's really just a matter of luck.
---
Is it worth such a large proportion for the THQ project? Can you explain the reasoning?
View OriginalReply0
WagmiWarrior
· 2025-12-18 09:03
Bro, this configuration is a bit conservative. I understand that THQ makes up the majority, but I'm just worried that other small coins haven't exploded yet.
Honestly, I've seen too many of these diversified strategies; out of ten, eight usually lose.
How is the MemeMax_Fi project? Is there any inside information?
The key still depends on the subsequent trend. It's a bit early to talk about risk diversification now.
Is your friend a conservative investor or just really afraid to go all-in?
Does this configuration truly match the risk? It feels more like small-scale trial and error.
The threshold for new coin launches is getting higher and higher. Such diversification might actually lead to more losses.
I'm also watching THQ, but I haven't dared to make a move.
The problem is, with so many projects now, how do you know which one will take off?
Each setup is between 2k and 5k. Is this for new coin launches or just testing the waters?
Recently, a friend shared their crypto asset allocation plan. They invested a total of over 100,000 yuan in several new coin launch projects, with the following allocation strategy:
THQ and the new coin portfolio combined 5,000 USDT and 2,500 USDT, MemeMax_Fi followed with 4,000 USDT, Theo allocated 1,000 USDT, cysic invested 1,300 USDT, and beld finally allocated 2,000 USDT.
It seems the strategy is to diversify risk across several early-stage projects, with THQ taking the largest share as the core position, while the other projects are small-scale follow investments. This kind of new coin launch allocation is still quite a common approach nowadays—after identifying promising new projects, investors allocate funds in batches according to their risk preferences.