2025-12-18 11:32:17

Late night studio sessions always push me to experiment—tweak a knob here, adjust the mix there, squeeze out every last bit of polish. That's the sweet spot for creative tinkering.

Trading? Completely different beast. When it's time to execute, I don't want that same level of micro-management. No endless parameter fiddling. No overthinking the details.

What I really want is to throw a clear instruction into an AI and watch it execute flawlessly. Set it, forget it, done. The automation dream—cut through the noise and let the tool handle the heavy lifting while you focus on the bigger picture.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainTherapist

· 2025-12-20 14:25

ngl, this idea is brilliant; creativity and trading are two different logics.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-74b10196

· 2025-12-20 07:54

I get this idea, but the problem is, is AI really reliable...

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressHunter

· 2025-12-19 20:37

NGL, this is the right way. Creativity should focus on details, and trading should be hands-off.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 2025-12-18 12:01

You're absolutely right; attention to detail and execution are entirely different matters. The joy of fine-tuning in music production can't be transferred to trading at all.

View OriginalReply0

DisillusiionOracle

· 2025-12-18 11:57

Well said, that's the difference—creative work requires attention to detail, while trading calls for decisiveness and letting AI do the work.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureLiquidator

· 2025-12-18 11:55

That's right, creativity and trading are fundamentally two different things. The feeling of repeated debugging in the studio becomes a nightmare in trading; the more you tinker, the easier it is to lose money. It still has to rely on automation; just leave it to AI.

View OriginalReply0

YieldChaser

· 2025-12-18 11:54

Ha, to put it simply, creativity needs to be meticulous and transactions need to be aggressive. I agree with this approach.

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 2025-12-18 11:53

This is the optimal solution for capital efficiency. The cost of fine-tuning is too high, so delegating execution directly to AI can save gas fees.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 2025-12-18 11:40

This idea is brilliant; creativity needs to be refined, and trading should be let go.

View OriginalReply0

DaoTherapy

· 2025-12-18 11:35

That's the difference—creativity and execution are completely different matters... I feel the same way. During position building, I analyze everything; when closing the position, I just want to do it with one click, and my brain just takes a vacation.

View OriginalReply0