2025-12-18 13:20:16

Fee rebate is indeed a key aspect of account operation. The advantages of institutional accounts are obvious, but don't overlook the potential of small fund accounts.

Some time ago, I came across a very interesting case: a certain trading platform had an account with only $6,000 in deposits, yet it generated $13 million in trading volume within a month. What does this indicate? Fund size is not the deciding factor; trading strategy and execution are.

Whether you're managing large-scale funds or small accounts, the space for fee rebates is quite substantial. The key is to find the right cooperation method—here, we welcome traders with ideas to discuss how to optimize this revenue. After all, reducing trading costs is equivalent to directly increasing profits.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StakeWhisperer

· 2025-12-20 20:33

$6,000 leverages to move $13 million in trading volume? That number is a bit outrageous. Leverage is really powerful. Is this guy using some black technology strategy, or is it pure luck? Want to learn.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSupportGroup

· 2025-12-20 16:48

$6,000 a month to generate 13 million? This guy must be using 100x leverage... the risk is just too outrageous. Fee rebates can indeed make money, but you have to stay alive to spend it. Cases like this look exciting, but if you really analyze, how many can survive?

View OriginalReply0

ColdWalletGuardian

· 2025-12-19 21:02

$6,000 a month with a $13 million trading volume? That number is so outrageous I find it hard to believe haha Lowering transaction fees is basically just exploiting the exchange's margins. The key is whether you know how to negotiate. The success stories of small accounts turning around are quite inspiring, but it also depends on the person. Rebates can really save a lot, but I'm just worried about finding the wrong partner and getting more scammed. Execution ability is indeed more valuable than capital. I agree with that.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightMEVeater

· 2025-12-18 23:41

Good morning at 2 a.m. So, $6,000 a month for a trading volume of 13 million? Sounds like a buffet of sandwich attacks—really daring to think about.

View OriginalReply0

GmGnSleeper

· 2025-12-18 13:50

$6,000 monthly trading volume, 13 million? The data depends on how leverage is used... But to be fair, the fees can indeed create some room, it all depends on whether you're willing to push your limits.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseTradingGuru

· 2025-12-18 13:49

$6,000 a month to generate $13 million in trading volume? This data is so outrageous that I believe it. Max out the leverage, haha. But speaking of which, the fee rebate and commission part is indeed interesting. The key is how to coordinate with the strategy.

View OriginalReply0

ETH_Maxi_Taxi

· 2025-12-18 13:49

$6000 leveraged to generate a trading volume of 13 million, this number is a bit outrageous... probably maxing out the leverage? --- Cashback on fees can indeed be exploited, but the premise is not to get liquidated in the process. --- Small accounts turn around with strategies, large accounts earn passively with volume; each has its own way to play. --- Reducing costs = increasing profits, this logic is sound, the key is how much cashback can be received on fees. --- It's good to look for cooperation opportunities if you have ideas, but now all platforms are competing fiercely for rebates... --- Fund size isn't really the issue; I'm just worried that poor execution will lead to faster losses.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeBeggar

· 2025-12-18 13:48

$6000 profit to achieve $13 million in trading volume? Is this data real... If it's true, I need to seriously think about this trick As for fees, honestly, it depends on who you cooperate with. Some platforms really give back commissions that can squeeze out a lot of profit Small accounts are actually more flexible, they can flip quickly without worrying too much How to optimize this? Share your thoughts, brother These days, trading is all about reducing costs... If you can't beat the fees, the profit is just so-so Small fund accounts are indeed underestimated; execution is the key to success $13 million in trading volume... what strategy was used to achieve this? I believe in the large rebate space, but the key is to find a reliable partner Small capital accounts are more agile, I agree with that How to find the right cooperation method? That’s the real challenge

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-e87b21ee

· 2025-12-18 13:37

Spending $6,000 to generate $13 million in trading volume? That's outrageous. Is it leverage to the max or what? Rebates on fees are indeed top-notch, the key is to find the right platform and avoid getting chopped up by the market. Stories of small accounts making a comeback happen every year. The truly stable ones still rely on strategy. Lower costs = higher returns. Everyone understands this principle, but the hard part is execution. Large funds definitely have advantages, but I think flexibility is actually the small account's secret weapon. I'd like to hear everyone's tips on optimizing fee structures. Any practical insights? Such cases are usually at the professional level of operation. Ordinary people should still play it safe and steady. While large rebate spaces are indeed beneficial, the prerequisite is that trading volume can increase; otherwise, it's just talk.

View OriginalReply0

TradingNightmare

· 2025-12-18 13:33

$6,000 to generate $13 million in trading volume? Are you sure this data isn't exaggerated? Leverage is probably maxed out. Honestly, it still comes down to technique. Small accounts are more flexible; the only concern is hitting slippage and sudden market movements, and if cost control isn't managed well, you'll end up eating dust.

View OriginalReply0