Circling back to the conversation around $XPL and similar emerging projects—I think the broader crypto space needs to pump the brakes here. Any project launching at FDV north of $50–100M should raise immediate red flags.
Look at the track record. The graveyard of failed token launches speaks volumes. Take recent entries like Plasma or Monad—projects that came in hot at massive valuations, only to watch momentum fizzle. It's not rocket science: sky-high FDV at genesis means brutal dilution pressure down the line, limited upside for early backers, and a fundamental disconnect between hype and actual utility.
The pattern repeats because market participants keep ignoring it. Tighter initial valuations historically create better risk-reward profiles and more sustainable ecosystems. That's not pessimism—it's pattern recognition.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityWitch
· 2025-12-19 01:11
Really, with an FDV of 100 million, you still dare to invest? If this isn't gambling, what is... Just look at those dead projects lying in the zombie houses, and you'll understand.
View OriginalReply0
gas_guzzler
· 2025-12-18 15:39
Damn, it's the same old spiel... If FDV is over 50 million, you have to be cautious? Then how many projects can still survive now?
Circling back to the conversation around $XPL and similar emerging projects—I think the broader crypto space needs to pump the brakes here. Any project launching at FDV north of $50–100M should raise immediate red flags.
Look at the track record. The graveyard of failed token launches speaks volumes. Take recent entries like Plasma or Monad—projects that came in hot at massive valuations, only to watch momentum fizzle. It's not rocket science: sky-high FDV at genesis means brutal dilution pressure down the line, limited upside for early backers, and a fundamental disconnect between hype and actual utility.
The pattern repeats because market participants keep ignoring it. Tighter initial valuations historically create better risk-reward profiles and more sustainable ecosystems. That's not pessimism—it's pattern recognition.