A recurring threat pattern has surfaced in the crypto space. Recent blockchain forensics uncovered a sophisticated scheme where Habi (Ghavard), a cybercriminal based in Canada, orchestrated over $2 million in fraudulent transfers within a single year. The primary weapon: classic social engineering tactics.
The investigation reveals how attackers exploited human trust rather than technical vulnerabilities—a method that remains devastatingly effective. Users were manipulated into compromising their accounts or revealing sensitive information, allowing thieves to drain wallets and move stolen funds across the blockchain.
This case highlights a critical reality for crypto participants: while blockchain technology is cryptographically secure, the weakest link remains human judgment. Security breaches often trace back to phishing, impersonation, or psychological manipulation rather than code exploits.
The key takeaway? No amount of technical security replaces vigilance. Verify sender identities, enable multi-factor authentication, and remain skeptical of unsolicited requests—especially those creating artificial urgency.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkTrooper
· 21h ago
It's the same old social engineering tricks... This guy lost two million just like that. You really can't trust people too much.
View OriginalReply0
ContractFreelancer
· 21h ago
Human nature is always the biggest vulnerability; no matter how advanced the technology, it can't prevent being scammed... $2 million is gone just like that.
---
Still the same saying, no matter how powerful the wallet, it can't stop a sincere phishing link.
---
That's why I always say multi-signature wallets are really necessary. Even if social engineering happens, it won't be a total setback overnight.
---
This guy has a big heart, managing to scam 2 million in a year... Looks like social engineering scams make more money than coding.
---
MFA, cold wallets, address verification... If you don't do these basic practices, do you still think you can survive in the crypto world? Dream on.
---
It's Canada again... Seems like many scam groups hide there, law enforcement is really lax.
View OriginalReply0
VitaliksTwin
· 22h ago
In simple terms, human nature is the easiest to attack. No matter how good the technical defenses are, it’s useless. The key still depends on your own brain...
---
It's another social engineering scam; this trick in crypto really never goes out of style.
---
Losing 2 million just like that, how much can they scam... I guess those who got baited are now kicking themselves.
---
Multi-factor authentication really must be enabled; it’s not an option.
---
Human nature > cryptography, that’s the truth... So even the most advanced wallet can’t save me from my own clumsiness.
---
Messages that urgently ask you to verify your identity are basically scams. Remember this.
---
It’s not the system’s design fault; it’s purely because users are too easy to deceive, haha.
---
Always claiming to understand security, yet still being fooled by a simple phishing email—that’s our circle.
---
No matter how secure the blockchain is, it’s useless; vulnerabilities are always between the ears.
A recurring threat pattern has surfaced in the crypto space. Recent blockchain forensics uncovered a sophisticated scheme where Habi (Ghavard), a cybercriminal based in Canada, orchestrated over $2 million in fraudulent transfers within a single year. The primary weapon: classic social engineering tactics.
The investigation reveals how attackers exploited human trust rather than technical vulnerabilities—a method that remains devastatingly effective. Users were manipulated into compromising their accounts or revealing sensitive information, allowing thieves to drain wallets and move stolen funds across the blockchain.
This case highlights a critical reality for crypto participants: while blockchain technology is cryptographically secure, the weakest link remains human judgment. Security breaches often trace back to phishing, impersonation, or psychological manipulation rather than code exploits.
The key takeaway? No amount of technical security replaces vigilance. Verify sender identities, enable multi-factor authentication, and remain skeptical of unsolicited requests—especially those creating artificial urgency.