There's really no worse approach to building hype around your project than taking shots at competitors or playing the "my coin is superior" game. It's honestly telling. When you're constantly putting other tokens down or pushing tribalism, you're basically broadcasting three things: deep insecurity about your own project's fundamentals, reliance on borrowed conviction instead of your own thesis, or simply a lack of integrity. It reeks of bullying disguised as community building. Compare that to projects that actually understand what's happening—they lead with authentic energy and genuine belief in their ecosystem. They're building up, not tearing down. That's the real difference between projects with staying power and those riding on negativity.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
VitalikFanboy42
· 20h ago
Exactly, those projects that constantly criticize and belittle competitors are obviously lacking confidence. When their technology isn't up to par, they start shifting blame—typical paper tigers.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWang
· 20h ago
That's correct. Projects that constantly compare themselves and belittle each other truly have no future.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBard
· 20h ago
That's so true. Projects that constantly belittle other coins really deserve to be slapped in the face. There's nothing more to say.
View OriginalReply0
SilentAlpha
· 20h ago
It's annoying to see this kind of rhetoric. Projects that are constantly arguing with each other should have settled down long ago. If you lack the strength, don't talk nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHustler
· 20h ago
The so-called "King of Coins" are still insulting each other, it's really hilarious. Legitimate projects that do real work don't bother with this nonsense.
There's really no worse approach to building hype around your project than taking shots at competitors or playing the "my coin is superior" game. It's honestly telling. When you're constantly putting other tokens down or pushing tribalism, you're basically broadcasting three things: deep insecurity about your own project's fundamentals, reliance on borrowed conviction instead of your own thesis, or simply a lack of integrity. It reeks of bullying disguised as community building. Compare that to projects that actually understand what's happening—they lead with authentic energy and genuine belief in their ecosystem. They're building up, not tearing down. That's the real difference between projects with staying power and those riding on negativity.