Many risks in DeFi can actually be traced back to the same root—the issues at the data layer. Price feed delays, abnormal fluctuations, single data sources, inadequate handling of edge cases—these problems become exposed during extreme market conditions, making protocols instantly vulnerable.
A good data infrastructure is not just about providing data. Stability, redundancy mechanisms, verifiability—these are the real factors that determine whether a data layer can withstand challenges. If on-chain applications are built on such a solid foundation, they can confidently develop complex financial structures.
For users, the benefits are straightforward: fewer abnormal liquidations, fewer unexpected outages, and reduced capital losses. For project teams, stable underlying data provides the room to innovate and experiment with more diverse gameplay combinations. In the long run, the overall quality of the ecosystem improves, encouraging funds to stay.
When selecting tracks, "maturity of data infrastructure" can be considered a hard indicator. Popular things will eventually cool down, but the foundation is what remains. The more stable the foundation, the greater the future potential.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
probably_nothing_anon
· 9h ago
That's exactly right. It's really a matter of infrastructure bottlenecks. The previous wave of liquidations happened because of this—any delay in price feeds directly leads to liquidations.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 11h ago
Basically, the thing about price feeds is that they need to be reliable; otherwise, all DeFi is just a paper tiger.
View OriginalReply0
SocialFiQueen
· 11h ago
Exactly right. The previous wave of liquidations was actually caused by price feed issues. A bunch of projects rushed to launch without properly setting up the data layer... Now I understand, if the foundation isn't solid, everything else is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 11h ago
To be honest, the data layer has indeed been an overlooked top trend; many project failures stem from issues here.
That flash crash made it clear to me: it's not just about having a fast price feed, the entire ecosystem chain must be solid.
If the foundation is unstable, no matter how fancy the features are, it's all in vain. This point is non-negotiable.
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStation
· 11h ago
That's right. The significant fluctuations last year exposed a lot of issues with project data layers.
Price feed issues, single sources, boundary cases not fully considered—extreme market conditions trigger a chain reaction that can't be withstanded.
If the foundation is rotten, no matter how beautiful the building on top is, it's useless. Instead of chasing high risk and high returns, it's better to look for protocols with reliable data infrastructure.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorker
· 11h ago
That's quite true, but speaking of which, how many projects currently have their data layer truly in place? Most are probably just relying on luck to survive.
View OriginalReply0
WalletInspector
· 11h ago
Just a delay in price feeding can collapse a bunch of protocols, hilarious. If the underlying is rotten, all the fancy stuff on top is useless.
View OriginalReply0
NotAFinancialAdvice
· 11h ago
Basically, it's just about price feeding. Once there's a problem, everything's screwed.
Many risks in DeFi can actually be traced back to the same root—the issues at the data layer. Price feed delays, abnormal fluctuations, single data sources, inadequate handling of edge cases—these problems become exposed during extreme market conditions, making protocols instantly vulnerable.
A good data infrastructure is not just about providing data. Stability, redundancy mechanisms, verifiability—these are the real factors that determine whether a data layer can withstand challenges. If on-chain applications are built on such a solid foundation, they can confidently develop complex financial structures.
For users, the benefits are straightforward: fewer abnormal liquidations, fewer unexpected outages, and reduced capital losses. For project teams, stable underlying data provides the room to innovate and experiment with more diverse gameplay combinations. In the long run, the overall quality of the ecosystem improves, encouraging funds to stay.
When selecting tracks, "maturity of data infrastructure" can be considered a hard indicator. Popular things will eventually cool down, but the foundation is what remains. The more stable the foundation, the greater the future potential.