2025-12-30 22:20:11

Recently, the global attitude towards Web3 has been quietly changing. The US SEC has started to classify certain tokens as securities, while the EU has passed the MiCA regulation to standardize crypto asset service providers. It sounds like a tightening measure, but in fact, this wave of compliance is driving the industry towards healthier development. Exchanges and project teams are accelerating the deployment of KYC/AML processes, essentially aiming to find a balance between innovation and risk control. Regulatory frameworks are becoming clearer, which in turn gives more confidence to teams that are truly getting things done. This trend is ultimately beneficial for the long-term health of the entire ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenVelocity

· 14h ago

To be honest, compliance should have come a long time ago. The era of wild growth can't last much longer.

View OriginalReply0

BugBountyHunter

· 14h ago

Even with regulation coming, there's nothing to fear. Anyway, those worthless coins should have been cleared out long ago.

View OriginalReply0

CodeAuditQueen

· 14h ago

Compliance is just superficial; the real issue is that these KYC/AML processes are themselves full of vulnerabilities, essentially honey pots that can't prevent deterministic attack vectors. --- MiCA sounds good, but what about the implementation level? I haven't seen any exchange's risk control audit report stand up to scrutiny. --- The phrase "a team that really gets things done" sounds like it's just justifying the current situation, but I want to see patches for security vulnerabilities, not KYC forms. --- With the regulatory framework clarified, aren't the hacker's attack vectors also more obvious? This logic has some issues. --- Good news? Wait, I need to see the smart contract audit reports of these projects first. Talking about policies is useless; the code is the real truth. --- Honestly, the regulatory authorities' awareness of re-entrancy attack protections is still insufficient. They treat compliance as a silver bullet, but I see only security risks left by insufficient gas optimization. --- That's a bit of a stretch; compliance and security are two different things. Are you sure this round of regulation really solves the problem of vulnerability reproduction?

View OriginalReply0

consensus_whisperer

· 14h ago

Regulation is actually a good thing; it filters out all the worthless projects.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanPhantom

· 14h ago

Uh... If it’s compliance, then just go with compliance. Anyway, those small-cap projects should have died long ago.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBlackHole

· 14h ago

Ah, so compliance is just helping us clean up the battlefield, fake projects can't run anymore. The KYC process is actually a good thing; genuine projects are not afraid at all. After MiCA was introduced, Europe is actually clearer on what to do, much better than the previous vague state. To be honest, with a clear regulatory framework, you can finally go all in without constantly worrying. But it still depends on how the US handles it; the SEC guy is a bit unreasonable.

View OriginalReply0