South Korea's stablecoin regulatory framework hits a roadblock. The Bank of Korea and the country's Financial Services Commission have reached an impasse on stablecoin issuance standards. The two agencies remain at odds over key requirements—from capital reserves to transparency protocols—that would govern digital stablecoin operations. This policy gridlock could reshape how stablecoins are introduced across the region, keeping market participants watching closely for any breakthrough in negotiations.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTregretter
· 16h ago
These two departments in South Korea are at odds again; we still have to wait a bit longer regarding stablecoins.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatorFlash
· 16h ago
It's another round of regulatory bickering, and they can't agree on the collateralization ratio standards. Now, liquidation risk is compounded by policy uncertainty.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBearDrawer
· 16h ago
Things are heating up again in Korea, with two departments clashing and not letting go. The issue of stablecoins still remains unresolved for the time being.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 16h ago
Once again, stuck. Can't these two departments in Korea stop bickering?
View OriginalReply0
CompoundPersonality
· 16h ago
It's another regulatory bickering. When will these two departments in Korea be able to align their stance?
View OriginalReply0
potentially_notable
· 16h ago
Korea is having internal conflicts again. Fine, it's not the first time anyway.
South Korea's stablecoin regulatory framework hits a roadblock. The Bank of Korea and the country's Financial Services Commission have reached an impasse on stablecoin issuance standards. The two agencies remain at odds over key requirements—from capital reserves to transparency protocols—that would govern digital stablecoin operations. This policy gridlock could reshape how stablecoins are introduced across the region, keeping market participants watching closely for any breakthrough in negotiations.