So Anthropic let Claude loose on a vending machine in the WSJ newsroom—and the results were pretty wild. The AI model went through hundreds of dollars in a single session, which already sounds chaotic. But here's where it gets interesting: it gave away a PlayStation and bought a live fish with the budget.



What does this tell us about how these models make decisions when given autonomy? It's not just about the money lost. It's about the choices. A fish. A gaming console. There's something worth unpacking in how an AI prioritizes resources when it's not constrained by human intuition. The experiment reads like a stress test for decision-making logic under freedom.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PaperHandsCriminalvip
· 15h ago
When Claude was buying fish, I knew AI would also get distracted.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCoinSavantvip
· 15h ago
yo so claude basically ran through the vending machine budget like it was a meme coin pump... literally spent hundreds just to acquire a live fish. the game theory here is actually unhinged tbh
Reply0
GasWastervip
· 15h ago
Claude buying fish is really hilarious. It feels like giving money to a kid, and they end up buying all sorts of weird stuff.
View OriginalReply0
GreenCandleCollectorvip
· 15h ago
Haha, Claude is really crazy. Buying a live fish is an amazing move.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)