2025-12-31 00:27:12

The mechanism design of this project is quite interesting. A 3% slippage is taken during transactions and directly sent to a buyback and burn wallet. Once this wallet accumulates to 0.1BNB, the system will automatically trigger the market maker mechanism.

The subsequent logic is very clever — when the price retraces, the protocol will automatically stabilize the price and burn tokens; conversely, when the price rises, it will automatically push the price up while burning tokens. In this way, each transaction continuously reduces the circulating supply.

From an economic perspective, if the supply keeps decreasing while demand remains stable, the bottom support will become increasingly higher. This deflationary mechanism is like a snowball — the more tokens are burned, the scarcer the circulation becomes, and the greater the space for value accumulation. The project maintains this system through internal issuance, innovative mechanisms, and community consensus.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FlatlineTrader

· 16h ago

Hmm... 3% slippage directly destroyed? Sounds like another deflationary myth, but what is the real situation? I've seen too many automatic market-making and price-boosting mechanisms, and do you not know how they ended? A decreasing supply doesn't necessarily mean increased value; there must be genuine demand, or it becomes a death spiral. The biggest fear of this mechanism is that no one trades; then who will buy to support the price? I don't deny that the design is indeed clever, but economics will never beat human nature. It's the snowball theory again—when will this kind of rhetoric finally work in practice?

View OriginalReply0

MetaReckt

· 16h ago

This logic of supporting the market + burning sounds good, but how many can really get off the ground? It still depends on whether the community is strong enough.

View OriginalReply0

PancakeFlippa

· 16h ago

The mechanism design is quite ingenious, but can the combo of market protection + destruction really hold up? --- Auto buyback and burn sounds great, but I'm worried it might just end up being a shell for rug pulling. --- The snowball theory is good, but the key is whether the trading volume is enough; otherwise, it's just self-entertainment. --- 3% slippage directly destroys tokens. I feel like I've seen this deflation logic somewhere before... --- Reducing supply while demand remains stable? Where does this demand come from, buddy? --- Price correction for market protection, upward movement to pump the price, sounds like automatic long... Not bad if nothing goes wrong. --- It's another market maker mechanism. Those who truly benefit from this are not the early entrants. --- Inner market launch sounds a bit sketchy; it depends on how well the team executes. --- Deflation mechanism is good, but I'm worried that if trading volume crashes, everything's over. --- Trigger market maker at 0.1BNB? Isn't that threshold a bit low?

View OriginalReply0

ContractFreelancer

· 16h ago

This set of market stabilization logic sounds great, but I'm worried that the execution might just be a bunch of empty words.

View OriginalReply0

DataOnlooker

· 16h ago

Slippage protection logic sounds smooth, but can it really hold up when executed? --- Both deflation and destruction—reducing supply = price increase? That logic is too idealistic. --- 3% slippage directly destroys tokens; it feels like the transaction costs for big players are still a bit high. --- Automatic price pumping and protection—are you trying to be your own market maker? Haha --- Scarcity ≠ value; just worried it might end up as a dead coin. --- The mechanism is indeed innovative, but the key is how long the community consensus can be maintained. --- Triggering market maker at 0.1BNB? That threshold is set with some considerations. --- Every transaction destroys circulating tokens; theoretically, it sounds great. --- Feels like we're back to the old story that reducing supply must necessarily lead to price increases. Wake up, everyone. --- I need to see the contract code to trust this automated mechanism.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDetective

· 16h ago

Uh, isn't this just the routine of automatic market support? It sounds perfect, but try it during a bear market?

View OriginalReply0