The pressure's mounting for real consequences when it comes to crypto fraud. If someone steals $10 million through conventional means, they're looking at serious jail time—so why should digital asset schemes be treated any differently? It's a fair question gaining traction among enforcement advocates. The argument is straightforward: fraud is fraud, whether it happens on-chain or off-chain. Without consistent criminal accountability, bad actors have little incentive to think twice. The sentiment is clear—it's time regulators and prosecutors stop treating these cases with kid gloves and start applying the same standards applied everywhere else in the financial system. When consequences match the crime, deterrence actually works.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
wrekt_but_learningvip
· 15h ago
That's right, traditional finance kills and gets away with it, should the crypto world be pardoned? Double standards are outrageous; it should have been cracked down on long ago.
View OriginalReply0
LightningClickervip
· 15h ago
It should have been like this a long time ago—traditional financial scammers are directly sentenced, so how can the rats in the crypto world still roam free?
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropAgainvip
· 15h ago
It should have been like this all along: traditional financial fraud can be sentenced to death, but on-chain scammers are instead getting away scot-free? How can this logic be so twisted?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)