**The Old Problem of International Finance**



Traditional large-scale financial aid often stalls. Donors worry about funds being diverted or embezzled, while recipients feel subjected to harsh conditions. Mutual distrust leads to prolonged negotiations, and the crisis continues to escalate.

Take a country's debt crisis as an example—donors froze $57 billion, with the condition that the recipient must first complete large-scale corporate restructuring and layoffs. But reforms touch vested interests, causing delays in implementation, and donors struggle to find credible progress reports. This creates a vicious cycle.

**What if on-chain terms could tell this story?**

Imagine $57 billion locked into a smart contract, with terms so precise they are written in every line of code:

Tranche 1 (Emergency Relief): $500 million released immediately to alleviate liquidity crisis.

Tranche 2 (Reform-Linked): When inflation drops below 10% and corporate debt ratios are controlled under 200%, $10 billion is automatically released.

The key is the monitoring mechanism. DAO oracles connect directly to the recipient country's statistical agencies and major enterprise ERP systems, capturing inflation data, debt ratios, and asset restructuring progress in real time. No manual audits are needed, and there’s no room for falsified reports.

**The Changes Brought by Automation and Discipline**

The recipient government no longer needs to kowtow to aid officials with reports. They only need to diligently complete reforms, because the math will automatically determine: when conditions are met, funds are transferred within seconds. The moment the Dazhou Group completes asset stripping, the oracle detects the on-chain status change, and Tranche 2 is triggered immediately.

This is not trust—it’s **verifiable transparency**. Both parties are locked into the same set of rules, and no one can cheat.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseLandladyvip
· 10h ago
It sounds great, but who will guarantee the authenticity of the oracle data? What if the ERP system gets hacked, or the statistical data is falsified? Ultimately, someone still needs to maintain this system.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenYieldvip
· 10h ago
lmao, so they're gonna slap some oracles on top of IMF negotiations and suddenly trust issues disappear? ngl the correlation matrix here is flawed as hell—garbage data in, garbage data out. seen this movie before during 2008, always ends with someone gaming the system.
Reply0
NotFinancialAdviservip
· 10h ago
Wow, this logic is so refreshing. The traditional financial world’s human relationships are directly turned into code on the blockchain, leaving no room for tricks. Smart contracts can indeed solve information asymmetry, but... who will oversee the oracle data sources? It’s the same old problem. The figure of 57 billion immediately makes me think of those failed rescue plans. Armchair strategies at best. This is the future of finance, right? Machine judgments leave no room for negotiation. Awesome. But someone has to be brave enough to take the first step. Which country in reality would want to be watched by a DAO? Still, we need to think about it.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperervip
· 10h ago
Are you a bit too optimistic... Oracles are inherently single points of failure. Who will ensure that the data sources are not falsified?
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightGamervip
· 10h ago
$57 billion is locked by code, and the oracle directly reads enterprise data. This is true "trustlessness"... Much more reliable than those tangled aid clauses.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)