Regarding ADA's market performance, there is an interesting phenomenon worth considering. For a long time, industry critics have argued that ADA's marketing efforts are insufficient, but in terms of actual results, this narrative has been quite effective—through multiple channels such as KOLs and communities, the project team has successfully built a comprehensive technical narrative logic that convinces investors of its future prospects. The problem is, when you compare ADA with other top ten cryptocurrencies by market cap, you will notice an awkward phenomenon: it often has limited upward movement, but when it falls, it drops quite sharply, repeating this cycle periodically.

Even more worth cautioning is the issue of investment mentality. The DCA (Dollar-Cost Averaging) methodology itself is not wrong, but many people have evolved from using it as a rational tool to developing a psychological dependency—investing just for the sake of DCA, gradually forgetting the original intention: making money in this market. People entering the crypto space generally seek higher returns, which is not inherently wrong, but when psychological cues replace market judgment, it becomes easy to fall into a self-hypnosis trap.

Rather than repeatedly testing whether a certain coin can turn around, it’s better to ask yourself: is this choice based on rational analysis or emotional attachment? If you just want stable returns, traditional high-quality stocks are actually more suitable. The opportunities and risks in the crypto market are amplified, and that is precisely its value.