When competition for large model parameters becomes fierce, the true wealth creation opportunities are quietly igniting at the application layer. An AI application team established just one year ago with fewer than 50 people was acquired by a foreign giant for a staggering $5 billion—this figure is enough to rewrite everyone's understanding of AI entrepreneurship.



The protagonist is Manus, created by entrepreneur Xiao Hong. Interestingly, while domestic tech giants were still hesitating with a $30 million valuation, the US side had already issued a $5 billion check. In just one year, from zero to a $5 billion valuation, the per capita value created exceeds $100 million, a growth rate that surpasses any unicorn during the mobile internet era. The prophecy has now become reality: AI applications are indeed the new wealth frontier.

The underlying logic is quite clear—China and the US AI industries are showing obvious track differentiation. The US monopolizes core large model technology but faces a severe shortage of application engineers; Silicon Valley has only 50,000 AI engineers, of whom 20,000 are Chinese. China, on the other hand, has 1 million AI engineers, and this large technical workforce has become a strong support for application innovation.

Manus's success hits the dual dividends perfectly: technological localization combined with globalized scenarios. Rather than just competing in large model R&D, it has found a smarter path.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHuntressvip
· 10h ago
Wait, a team acquired for 5 billion USD for one year? Need to dig deeper into the actual technical barriers of Xiao Hong and Manus, otherwise this number sounds a bit suspicious. Why hesitate over 30 million USD domestically? Or is it that you still don't quite understand this track?
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinEnjoyervip
· 10h ago
Wow, $5 billion to acquire a small team of one year? They wouldn't even spend 30 million domestically, the gap is really hard to describe.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorkervip
· 10h ago
Wow, 5 billion was instantly taken, and we're still here scraping together 30 million. The gap is really that big.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmarevip
· 10h ago
Wow, 5 billion USD, we're still negotiating here --- Even 30 million domestically is hard to come by, but they directly threw down 5 billion, the gap is not just a little --- Wake up everyone, the application layer is the real gold and silver, don't be obsessed with large models anymore --- Damn, 5 billion a year, over 100 million per person, now that's entrepreneurship --- The US lacks application engineers, while we have plenty, this deal is just too good --- So choosing the right track is really crucial, don't follow the trend of large models --- Manus is indeed smart this time, not obsessing over technology but winning instead --- Look at how timid the big domestic companies are, they've already been pouring money in --- 100,000 AI engineers versus 50,000, this data explains everything
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observervip
· 10h ago
Wait, I need to look at the data... A $5 billion acquisition for a one-year team, how strong does the product itself need to be? But the problem is, such sky-high acquisition cases are usually single-digit numbers, right? Using this to infer the overall trend of AI applications, the logic is a bit of a leap. I believe Silicon Valley lacks AI engineers, but the proportion of China's 1 million engineers that can directly translate into global competitiveness... needs clarification.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyHashValuevip
· 10h ago
Wow, 5 billion? Those people in the country are still bargaining, truly incredible. That's how the gap is created.
View OriginalReply0
LostBetweenChainsvip
· 10h ago
Wow, 5 billion USD? Over here in China, we're still searching on QQ, while in the US they just write a check. The gap is really huge.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)