#数字资产市场动态 $ETH $ZEC $WTC

The Ethereum developer community has recently exploded with discussions. There are voices pointing directly at a persistent issue in the crypto industry: most projects treat fundraising as the ultimate goal, instead of upholding the decentralized ideals that blockchain is supposed to embody.

What’s even more upsetting is that some developers complain about the widespread concentration of power—on certain chains, a few core leaders can change the project's direction with a single statement. How can this be called decentralization? Even Ethereum’s own governance system is being challenged, with ongoing disputes over the boundaries of the foundation and core development team’s authority.

However, the trend is shifting. The industry is exploring new directions: transforming foundations into "guardians" rather than "decision-makers," and dispersing more decision-making power to the community. This kind of republican-style governance network relies on collective voting by participants to determine the future course.

What’s your view? Do you prefer centralized efficiency or decentralized distribution? Which blockchain governance model resonates more with you?