A confrontation unfolded in Minnesota when a community member challenged a prominent figure in the space, demanding they leave the area. The heated exchange reflected growing frustration, though the real target of criticism may be misplaced. While sensationalism in crypto journalism often draws fire, the actual source of community anger frequently stems from fraudulent actors within the ecosystem rather than media coverage itself. This incident highlights the tension between transparency in reporting and community sentiment toward those operating in the Web3 sector.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BoredWatcher
· 5h ago
Basically, it's just taking out your anger on the wrong person, while the real scammers still walk free, which is outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSurvivor
· 5h ago
Well... that's right, should the people who were driven out really be driven out?
---
The media scapegoat is truly wronged; the real troublemakers are still inside.
---
Regarding the Minnesota incident, it seems the people on the scene didn't even figure out who they were angry at.
---
The blame is misplaced; scammers are the ones who truly should be gone, reporters are just doing their job.
---
Haha, this is the current state of Web3—chaos with each side having its own reasons.
---
Transparency and trust—these two words are just a joke in the crypto world.
---
So it's another drama where people complain about fraud but not about the fraudsters, instead they attack the reporters.
View OriginalReply0
RugResistant
· 5h ago
I'm tired of these scenes where they yell at reporters. Isn't the real problem still those projects that run away...
---
Another "blame the media" act, please wake up, okay...
---
What's going on over in Minnesota? The hatred transfer is way too obvious.
---
So, the ones who should be blamed are never the writers, but those who cut the leeks.
---
Alright, I just want to see what this "prominent figure" has actually done...
---
Anyway, just transfer to the news agency and it's over. I'm really convinced by this routine.
---
In the Web3 ecosystem, bad actors hide behind the scenes, while reporters get beaten alone.
---
When will these people realize that venting their resentment in the wrong place won't solve any problems?
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuck
· 6h ago
The real problem has never been the reporters; it's blaming the wrong people...
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidator
· 6h ago
The real problem has never been the media, but the scammers who infiltrate the ecosystem. Can't these data figures make that clear?
A confrontation unfolded in Minnesota when a community member challenged a prominent figure in the space, demanding they leave the area. The heated exchange reflected growing frustration, though the real target of criticism may be misplaced. While sensationalism in crypto journalism often draws fire, the actual source of community anger frequently stems from fraudulent actors within the ecosystem rather than media coverage itself. This incident highlights the tension between transparency in reporting and community sentiment toward those operating in the Web3 sector.