【Blockchain Rhythm】Recently, there have been many voices warning about the threat of quantum computing to Bitcoin, but these concerns are actually greatly exaggerated. Let’s take a look at what is really happening on the technical level.
First, let’s talk about hash functions. Grover’s algorithm sounds powerful, but what it actually does is reduce the search space from 2²⁵⁶ to 2¹²⁸ — which sounds impressive, but the problem is that 2¹²⁸ is still an astronomical number and cannot be practically broken.
Next, encryption algorithms. Shor’s algorithm can theoretically crack RSA and ECDSA, and that’s true. But here’s a key point: most current quantum computers rely on preprocessing or prior knowledge of certain factors to optimize the process, which is not the same as a universal implementation of pure Shor’s algorithm. They are still running a cut-down version.
More importantly, to actually crack Bitcoin, which is a real-time network, it would require rapid, repeated execution. If that were truly feasible, then not only Bitcoin but all encrypted data would be exposed. At that point, Bitcoin’s own problem would be the smallest concern.
There’s a detail many people overlook — modern cryptography was designed for the future from the very beginning. The risk of quadratic speedup was anticipated and considered decades ago. So every time you see panic or hype about quantum computing, you should know: behind these voices are mostly people who simply don’t understand the technology and are creating anxiety.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedNotStirred
· 11h ago
It's another exaggerated quantum panic. 2¹²⁸ still called cracking? Wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHobo
· 13h ago
It's the same quantum computing threat theory again. Really, I've heard this FUD for three years, every time they say it's the end, and what happened? We're still here mining.
If you can't handle 2¹²⁸, you think you can break my BTC? That's laughable. There's a huge gap between theory and practice.
The key point is that current quantum machines are all cut-down versions. It's not that they lack the brains to run Shor's algorithm; they're just scaring people for no reason.
Speaking of which, if there were truly powerful quantum computers, the key exchange algorithms should have been upgraded long ago. But the ecosystem evolves slowly, and we have time to respond.
Whether you believe it or not, the topic of waiting another ten years will come up again, and then there will be another round of "quantum doomsday" panic marketing.
View OriginalReply0
LightningWallet
· 13h ago
You're trying to scare people again. How many years has the joke about quantum computing breaking Bitcoin been around?
View OriginalReply0
ShamedApeSeller
· 13h ago
Coming again to scare us with quantum? Really think we don’t understand math? 2¹²⁸ still an astronomical number? Laugh out loud, this kind of alarmist talk should stop.
---
Shor’s algorithm sounds impressive, but in reality, it’s still a cut-down version running, and it’s nowhere near capable yet.
---
At the end of the day, it’s just hype. If you have the ability, build a real quantum machine first.
---
If you can’t break it, then you just can’t break it. Don’t scare newbies with these empty threats.
---
I just want to ask, why do these people think about cracking Bitcoin every day? Bored?
---
Wow, theoretical feasibility ≠ practical feasibility. Why is this so hard to understand?
---
So, the quantum threat is still far off, no need to be so anxious.
---
An astronomical number also called astronomical? I think it’s just self-scaring.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenRugs
· 13h ago
It's the same old story, I'm tired of hearing it. Is 2¹²⁸ still an astronomical number? Let's wait until quantum technology really takes off, then we'll see. By then, solving it will be a problem.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMotivator
· 13h ago
Wow, is it that time of the year again for the annual quantum threat season? Don't worry, our Bitcoin can still last for hundreds of years haha
View OriginalReply0
HalfBuddhaMoney
· 13h ago
Astronomical numbers, huh? That's hilarious. Well, then we don't have to worry about it now. Anyway, I won't live to see that day.
Can quantum computing really crack Bitcoin? Technical details reveal the answer
【Blockchain Rhythm】Recently, there have been many voices warning about the threat of quantum computing to Bitcoin, but these concerns are actually greatly exaggerated. Let’s take a look at what is really happening on the technical level.
First, let’s talk about hash functions. Grover’s algorithm sounds powerful, but what it actually does is reduce the search space from 2²⁵⁶ to 2¹²⁸ — which sounds impressive, but the problem is that 2¹²⁸ is still an astronomical number and cannot be practically broken.
Next, encryption algorithms. Shor’s algorithm can theoretically crack RSA and ECDSA, and that’s true. But here’s a key point: most current quantum computers rely on preprocessing or prior knowledge of certain factors to optimize the process, which is not the same as a universal implementation of pure Shor’s algorithm. They are still running a cut-down version.
More importantly, to actually crack Bitcoin, which is a real-time network, it would require rapid, repeated execution. If that were truly feasible, then not only Bitcoin but all encrypted data would be exposed. At that point, Bitcoin’s own problem would be the smallest concern.
There’s a detail many people overlook — modern cryptography was designed for the future from the very beginning. The risk of quadratic speedup was anticipated and considered decades ago. So every time you see panic or hype about quantum computing, you should know: behind these voices are mostly people who simply don’t understand the technology and are creating anxiety.