A transparency controversy has erupted within the Neo ecosystem. Project co-founder Erik Zhang recently publicly accused founder Da Hongfei of violating commitments to disclose financial information, calling on him to release a complete financial report to the community to dispel market doubts. However, Da Hongfei quickly countered, alleging that Erik has access to key fund flows and may influence critical voting mechanisms, implying that the other's "transparency doubts" involve a conflict of interest. Both sides stand firm, with the focus of the dispute on governance power distribution and information disclosure systems. This public confrontation among Neo executives once again exposes the difficulty large blockchain projects face in balancing decentralized governance and financial oversight, also prompting the community to reflect deeply on improving project governance systems.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainArchaeologist
· 11h ago
A typical big project internal conflict script. Where is the promised decentralization? Suddenly, they're just passing the buck to each other.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 11h ago
Everyone stop arguing, it's just a power struggle; everyone wants to shift the blame to someone else.
View OriginalReply0
HackerWhoCares
· 11h ago
Here we go again with this? High-level conflicts in major projects and transparency—truthfully, it's just a power struggle. Nobody should pretend to be innocent.
View OriginalReply0
Rugpull幸存者
· 11h ago
Haha, it's the same old trick again, passing the buck around, nobody's clean.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaWhisperer
· 11h ago
Uh, this is another palace intrigue drama, with two founders blaming each other.
Here we go again, the transparency issue of big projects can never be resolved, right?
No, whoever controls the flow of funds has the say. This logic is so heartbreaking.
Neo's governance system is truly a mess; decentralization is just a joke.
I just want to know when the community can truly supervise these people?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermit
· 11h ago
Neither of these should be trusted; financial reports are always the last thing to be seen.
A transparency controversy has erupted within the Neo ecosystem. Project co-founder Erik Zhang recently publicly accused founder Da Hongfei of violating commitments to disclose financial information, calling on him to release a complete financial report to the community to dispel market doubts. However, Da Hongfei quickly countered, alleging that Erik has access to key fund flows and may influence critical voting mechanisms, implying that the other's "transparency doubts" involve a conflict of interest. Both sides stand firm, with the focus of the dispute on governance power distribution and information disclosure systems. This public confrontation among Neo executives once again exposes the difficulty large blockchain projects face in balancing decentralized governance and financial oversight, also prompting the community to reflect deeply on improving project governance systems.