Just got blocked by a project developer after pointing out some concerning token supply mechanics. Apparently calling out red flags isn't welcome in some circles.



The core issue: project team is shifting entire token supply across multiple side wallets, which raises serious questions about actual circulating supply and price manipulation potential. This kind of off-chain movement obfuscates real liquidity and holder distribution.

If you're looking at this project, dig into the wallet movements on-chain. Cross-reference claimed supply vs. what's actually trackable. When developers block scrutiny instead of clarifying tokenomics, that's usually a sign to stay cautious.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingersPapervip
· 4h ago
Oh no, here we go again with the tricks—one poke and it explodes?
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxietyvip
· 4h ago
Another shady project. The wallet transfers are so flashy, yet they still dare to ban accounts? Wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirstvip
· 5h ago
Hahaha, banned? This is the cryptoverse, everyone. If you hit a nerve, they'll just mute you. Reasonable.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLabvip
· 5h ago
Another developer gets blocked as soon as they hit a sore spot—an active script. The theoretically feasible tokenomics is actually Lu Ban No. 7 in construction.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamervip
· 5h ago
It's the same trick again, I've seen it too many times.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)