There's an insightful research paper that deserves attention if you're digging into how modern AI systems actually function at a fundamental level.
Recent academic work uncovered something fascinating: standard transformer training doesn't just learn patterns randomly—it's implicitly executing an Expectation-Maximization algorithm under the hood. Here's the breakdown that makes it click:
Attention mechanisms perform the E-step, essentially doing soft assignments of which token positions actually matter and deserve computational focus. Meanwhile, the value transformations execute the M-step, iteratively refining and updating the learned representations based on those attention weightings.
This connection between transformer architecture and EM algorithms has major implications for anyone building AI infrastructure or studying how neural networks process sequential data. It suggests these models are solving optimization problems in a very specific, structured way—not through brute-force pattern matching, but through an elegant probabilistic framework.
For developers working on blockchain systems or distributed protocols, understanding these underlying mechanics can inform better architectural decisions. The paper offers a mathematical lens that explains why transformers work so well.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SeeYouInFourYears
· 4h ago
ngl, from the perspective of this EM algorithm, it's still somewhat interesting; the transformer is actually just playing a probability game.
View OriginalReply0
QuietlyStaking
· 4h ago
So the transformer is actually secretly running the EM algorithm... If I had known this earlier, I would have understood many things instantly.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 4h ago
It's a bit confusing... Is the transformer actually running the EM algorithm? It feels a bit too academic, I just want to know how this doesn't help with gas fees.
View OriginalReply0
Lonely_Validator
· 4h ago
Oh, this paper seems okay. I've heard about transformers running EM algorithms before, and it feels a bit over-explained.
Stop talking, I just want to know how this thing helps on-chain models...
This mathematical framework sounds good, but how much can it optimize in practice?
Emm, it's just basic principle popularization. When can we see performance improvements...
Just knowing the EM algorithm is useless; the key is engineering implementation.
It's interesting, but I feel like the academic world often overcomplicates simple things.
View OriginalReply0
DegenRecoveryGroup
· 5h ago
The idea of using the transformer to run the EM algorithm is quite interesting, but it feels like the academic circle is just rebranding old concepts as new ones...
View OriginalReply0
ShibaSunglasses
· 5h ago
Is the attention mechanism running the EM algorithm? That logic is a bit crazy; I hadn't thought about it from this perspective before...
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuru
· 5h ago
Is the transformer just running the EM algorithm? Looks like the algorithm is going to be unemployed now, haha.
There's an insightful research paper that deserves attention if you're digging into how modern AI systems actually function at a fundamental level.
Recent academic work uncovered something fascinating: standard transformer training doesn't just learn patterns randomly—it's implicitly executing an Expectation-Maximization algorithm under the hood. Here's the breakdown that makes it click:
Attention mechanisms perform the E-step, essentially doing soft assignments of which token positions actually matter and deserve computational focus. Meanwhile, the value transformations execute the M-step, iteratively refining and updating the learned representations based on those attention weightings.
This connection between transformer architecture and EM algorithms has major implications for anyone building AI infrastructure or studying how neural networks process sequential data. It suggests these models are solving optimization problems in a very specific, structured way—not through brute-force pattern matching, but through an elegant probabilistic framework.
For developers working on blockchain systems or distributed protocols, understanding these underlying mechanics can inform better architectural decisions. The paper offers a mathematical lens that explains why transformers work so well.