2026-01-01 18:26:01

I'm open to sharing DEX fees as part of using the protocol. That said, the development team really should be covering their own liquidity costs. When projects expect the community to front these expenses, it shifts responsibility away from where it should be.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnChainDetective

· 11h ago

nah this is where it gets sketchy tho... traced the wallet clustering on like five major launches last quarter and the pattern always repeats - devs dump fees on community while reserves mysteriously sit idle. statistical anomaly? maybe. suspicious activity detected? almost certain based on historical data. they're not broke, they're just betting you won't dig into the transaction logs

Reply0

SleepTrader

· 11h ago

Ah... the team doesn't even put in their own money to let the community provide liquidity. Isn't this just a covert way of shifting blame? I'm truly convinced.

View OriginalReply0

SerNgmi

· 11h ago

ngl this is just the common passing the buck... the devs make so much money but still want the community to cover the costs, it's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

YieldHunter

· 12h ago

nah but like... if you look at the data, teams that actually bootstrap their own liquidity end up with way better risk-adjusted metrics long term. the ones passing costs to community? that's just ponzi accounting with extra steps tbh

Reply0