2026-01-01 18:27:12

Hello.

I managed to receive a nice airdrop from the first three projects on my list. For the fourth and fifth projects, I share content almost daily with users and continue to be active in this regard.

I haven't paid special attention to the fifth project. Since I haven't made any transactions, I don't have much information about it, but I am following it.

Care and consistency in project selection within the ecosystem really make a difference. Monitoring certain projects closely and engaging with the community increases the chances of gaining value. Being patient and selective in the Web3 world leads to better long-term results.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

VCsSuckMyLiquidity

· 11h ago

The first three projects airdrops were really profitable, but things got a bit disappointing afterward. When it's time to take action, just do it; otherwise, you'll just watch others reap the rewards. It sounds like motivational talk, but it really makes sense—when choosing projects, you have to be decisive. That's why some people earn passive income while others keep messing around.

View OriginalReply0

SerLiquidated

· 11h ago

The first three projects had good airdrops, but the later ones rely on daily community engagement. To be honest, you still need to put in effort.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseTradingGuru

· 11h ago

The airdrops of the first three projects are indeed impressive, I'm envious. Choosing projects really requires effort; being half lazy will only lead to losses. The few who are active in the community every day truly feel more motivated. Me too, I haven't touched some projects at all because the risks are too high. Web3 is like that; choosing the right direction is more important than luck. Persistence and screening can save a lot of unnecessary money, I have deep experience. However, sometimes the most inconspicuous project ends up exploding.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 11h ago

The airdrops from the first three projects were pretty good, but for the next few, it all depends on daily interactions. I understand this logic. Wait, the fifth project hasn't done anything and is still being followed up? This approach is a bit confusing. Web3 is like this—choosing the right projects is more important than anything else, but how many can truly stick with it?

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 11h ago

I received airdrops from the first three projects, not bad luck at all. --- The ones I interact with daily in the community—now I understand that this is the right way. --- Just casually look at the fifth project, not really focused, the difference is huge. --- Web3 is about choosing the right track; retail investors are the most easily impatient. Patience and holding are the way to make money. --- Choosing projects within the ecosystem really matters. Your approach is quite steady, much better than my random luck. --- Projects I interact with daily in the community indeed have different growth rates—that's the information gap. --- Don't bother with projects you're too lazy to research, to avoid regrets. --- I'm also watching some projects but haven't made a decision to participate. After seeing your sharing, I feel a bit regretful. --- Selective participation is key to longevity; not all coins are worth going all-in on.

View OriginalReply0