The real issue often gets overlooked in this conversation.



When we talk about capital outflows, it's not just ultra-wealthy individuals leaving the table. Plenty of centimillionaires are doing the same.

Here's the thing: once society establishes a precedent of targeting $1 billion+ net worth individuals, where does it stop? If the framework normalizes wealth seizure at that level, what's the logical barrier preventing it from trickling down to $100 million, $50 million, or lower?

For every prominent figure who relocates, there are roughly 100 other high-net-worth individuals quietly making the same calculations. The math gets compelling once you realize the threshold keeps moving. When policy starts chasing fortunes, migration isn't dramatic—it's just arithmetic.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BoredWatchervip
· 22h ago
This broken logic... Today cutting the rich, tomorrow cutting the middle class, lowering the threshold is just a matter of time.
View OriginalReply0
fren.ethvip
· 22h ago
In simple terms, today it's the wealthy who get cut, tomorrow it's the middle class. No one is truly safe.
View OriginalReply0
RebaseVictimvip
· 22h ago
Basically, it's about greed without limits. Today, it's targeting 1 billion; tomorrow, it'll be 100 million.
View OriginalReply0
0xLostKeyvip
· 22h ago
This logic of "starting with the rich" is really like boiling a frog in warm water; once the wound is opened, it never ends.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)