Have you heard of projects regularly burning tokens to maintain their value? But what if I told you there’s a type of token where the right to burn is entirely in the hands of retail investors, and the project team can’t even interfere?



UNI has just introduced such a novel feature. The recent burning data might seem insignificant—only 24,000 tokens— but the underlying mechanism design is what makes this system truly impressive.

**Community Decides: Decentralizing the Burning Rights**

How does the traditional model work? The project team holds the burning rights and operates periodically—essentially a centralized approach. UNI does the opposite: as long as you can gather transaction fees worth 4,000 tokens—possibly across multiple liquidity pools—you can trigger a burn directly through a smart contract. No approval needed, no waiting, fully decentralized logic.

Currently, the market triggers a burn approximately every 6 to 8 hours. It sounds like a small amount, but what does this reflect? The real trading activity within the ecosystem, not just marketing efforts by a team. The motivation for burning comes from the transactions themselves, from the fees earned by liquidity providers—that’s what makes it sustainable.

**Why is it still so small? The answer lies in “Pools”**

Someone asked: Since anyone can initiate a burn, why is the amount so small? The reason is straightforward—there aren’t enough pools with open fee-sharing. Currently, only V2 and some V3 pools’ fees are integrated into the burn protocol, and many liquidity pools haven’t activated this feature at all.

Imagine a shopping mall where only a few stores have checkout counters; the transaction fees from other stores don’t go into the burn account. Once more pools open up, and their fee contributions increase, the frequency and scale of burns will also rise accordingly. That’s where UNI’s burn mechanism truly shows its potential.

This design isn’t just a technical innovation; it’s an exploration of new ideas in token economics: allowing the value from each transaction to contribute to the ecosystem’s self-optimization.
UNI0,72%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
0xInsomniavip
· 1h ago
Hmm, decentralized burning sounds good, but can this really be sustained in the long run? Or will it ultimately rely on trading volume to support it?
View OriginalReply0
GasWranglervip
· 12h ago
technically speaking, if you actually analyze the fee mechanics here... the bottleneck isn't philosophical, it's just that most pools haven't switched on the burn flag yet. mathematically speaking, scaling this is trivial once v3 adoption hits critical mass. sub-optimal distribution model tbh
Reply0
LiquidatedThricevip
· 12h ago
This logic sounds good, but how many retail investors can really get involved... Most of it still depends on LP players to drive it forward.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTherapistvip
· 12h ago
To be honest, this logic is a bit interesting... but I'm still a little worried. Can it really rely on retail investor fees to drive destruction, or is it just another seemingly decentralized marketing gimmick?
View OriginalReply0
ContractTearjerkervip
· 12h ago
Wow, this is true decentralization. Retail investors control the burn rights, while the project team just relaxes. This idea is brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropNinjavip
· 12h ago
Wow, this is what true decentralization looks like—can the project team even intervene? This logic is brilliant. Giving the community the power to destroy tokens is almost the opposite of traditional control. It feels like UNI is making a pretty bold move. It's just that the pool hasn't fully opened yet, right? Once those V3 pools catch up, the destruction numbers will double, and that’s real sustainability. The problem is, who’s willing to spend 4000 tokens on fees to trigger destruction now… How can retail investors play along? UNI’s mechanism isn’t that complicated, but the key is whether the actual trading volume in the ecosystem can keep up. Otherwise, it’s all just talk.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)