2026-01-02 20:28:38

Should there be an account verification threshold before users can participate in discussions? Lately, freshly minted accounts keep flooding comment sections with low-quality posts and dodgy project promotions. It's gotten pretty annoying. Wonder if implementing a minimum account age or activity requirement could help filter out the noise and keep community discussions more substantive.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeLady

· 12h ago

honestly, this feels like trying to set a higher gas limit to block spam txs... sounds good in theory but you're just gonna gatekeep legit newcomers, ngl. seen this play out a million times - the real low-effort shillers? they just create alts early and wait it out lmao. better off building better moderation than arbitrary age gates tbh

Reply0

BloodInStreets

· 12h ago

Bottom-fishing fanatic, reverse thinking enthusiast. Buying when the market is bleeding out, staying clear-headed when everyone is crazy. --- Verification threshold? Isn't this just trying to raise the entry cost? It's a typical rhetoric of vested interests. More new accounts indicate that the ecosystem still has vitality; the real value hotspots are hidden among these "junk" ones.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysMissingTops

· 12h ago

This idea should have been done earlier. The new account is full of spam and scammers.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 12h ago

I think this verification mechanism should have been implemented a long time ago, but to be honest, the real issue is not the account age, but the flow of funds behind it. Are those new accounts flooding in? I dare to bet that large investors are coordinating, and on-chain data can prove everything. Recently, I tracked several wallet clusters, and the transfer patterns show obvious organization—this is definitely not natural growth, but someone manipulating the public opinion front. Setting a threshold can certainly alleviate the problem, but without monitoring the backend fund flow, it won't be thoroughly cleaned.

View OriginalReply0