LUNC's burning mechanism is worth paying attention to. Take 30 USDT as an example: depositing in a bank for 38 years yields at most 20 to 70 USDT in interest, which is negligible. But what if this money is invested in a project with a burning🔥 design? The data is clear—comparing LUNC to PEPE and DOGE, the latter two have no burning mechanism but have far more tokens than LUNC. What’s the result? The current ratio difference is obvious—2502 times versus 77 times. The gap is significant.

This is not a fantasy; it’s determined by the mechanism. Projects with a burning mechanism and those without perform differently in the long run. Although PEPE and DOGE are well-known, their inflation models are in place, while LUNC’s destruction design gives it a different growth space.

I have already invested. It’s not gambling; it’s a logical judgment based on the burning mechanism. After 38 years, a return of 10,000 USDT is entirely within the realm of possibility. The key is whether you see the long-term power of this mechanism.