#加密货币监管政策 Seeing the news that Lummis will step down in 2027, my first reaction is: political cycles are short, but policy dividends last long. She is pushing cryptocurrency legislation as a political legacy, what does this mean for the entire industry?
Honestly, clarifying the regulatory framework is a double-edged sword. In the short term, reduced policy uncertainty will attract traditional capital, and institutional traders who follow early movers will have many profit opportunities. But in the long run, once regulations are truly implemented, market structure will be reshaped—those strategies relying on gray areas for arbitrage will no longer work.
Recently, when adjusting my copy-trading strategies, I’ve been thinking about this issue. For high-risk appetite followers, now is the time to bottom-fish on policy expectation differences, and you can follow some keen traders. But be sure to leave enough risk buffers, as market volatility will be high before and after policy implementation. For more conservative followers, it might be better to wait until the regulatory framework is clearer before increasing positions—by then, there will be structural opportunities in compliant projects.
The key is not to be blinded by short-term market movements. The period of policy dividends and the period after are two completely different games. You need to understand your holding cycle and risk tolerance, then decide whom to follow and how much. Practice makes perfect; traders who have experienced a full policy cycle are the most valuable.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
#加密货币监管政策 Seeing the news that Lummis will step down in 2027, my first reaction is: political cycles are short, but policy dividends last long. She is pushing cryptocurrency legislation as a political legacy, what does this mean for the entire industry?
Honestly, clarifying the regulatory framework is a double-edged sword. In the short term, reduced policy uncertainty will attract traditional capital, and institutional traders who follow early movers will have many profit opportunities. But in the long run, once regulations are truly implemented, market structure will be reshaped—those strategies relying on gray areas for arbitrage will no longer work.
Recently, when adjusting my copy-trading strategies, I’ve been thinking about this issue. For high-risk appetite followers, now is the time to bottom-fish on policy expectation differences, and you can follow some keen traders. But be sure to leave enough risk buffers, as market volatility will be high before and after policy implementation. For more conservative followers, it might be better to wait until the regulatory framework is clearer before increasing positions—by then, there will be structural opportunities in compliant projects.
The key is not to be blinded by short-term market movements. The period of policy dividends and the period after are two completely different games. You need to understand your holding cycle and risk tolerance, then decide whom to follow and how much. Practice makes perfect; traders who have experienced a full policy cycle are the most valuable.