2026-01-08 15:21:54

The topic of meme coin community building is worth discussing, especially the logic involved in spot listing decisions on exchanges. On the surface, it seems lively, but to truly understand why some top-tier exchanges are so cautious about listing certain meme coins, we need to start with the chip structure of the whales.

Look at the meme projects on Sol or BSC that can really take off; their bottom often has at least 50% of the chips held by a few large holders. Those that rely solely on community-driven growth and have no major whales controlling the market to reach a $20M market cap? Honestly, they are very rare, few and far between.

From the exchange’s perspective, what they fear most isn’t the on-chain participants’ sentiment being high, but their own KPI—whether the price can show a decent increase after listing. The most awkward scenario is a sudden dump right after listing, which directly affects the platform’s reputation and trading volume. Those holding large chips know this well—they’re just waiting for the perfect exit window. Spot listing is the biggest liquidity exit, no doubt about it.

Compared to the Pepe era of 2022, retail investors are much more cautious now. Dumping easily can lead to collective condemnation as a "跑路币" (exit scam coin), which is a very bad reputation. So, before listing, exchanges need to check whether the community’s big holders have what’s called “vision”—are they willing to part with some chips early on, so that the post-listing K-line doesn’t look so ugly? It’s not about completely preventing dumps—that’s unrealistic—but about making the charts less ugly, so the platform doesn’t take all the blame.

On the other hand, the more vigorous the community building, the more people are waiting for the moment of spot listing to collectively dump. The selling pressure becomes increasingly uncontrollable. Once the selling pressure gets out of control, the risk becomes terrifying—if it crashes, it becomes industry news. That’s why some projects, even after launching Alpha, opening contracts, or listing on spot, show surprisingly cold trading data. If you understand this logic, you can pretty much see through the exchange’s calculations.

MEME6,11%

SOL2,52%

PEPE12,49%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PhantomHunter

· 01-11 15:07

Basically, it's a zero-sum game, and the big players have already calculated the accounts. Retail investors are not that naive anymore; directly smashing the price can easily backfire. Exchanges are most afraid of reputation; it's more important than anything else. Real meme coins are all about concentrated chips; that's no secret. The more enthusiastic the community, the more dangerous it is? It sounds contradictory, but it's actually very reasonable.

View OriginalReply0

tx_or_didn't_happen

· 01-10 06:59

Ha, basically the market makers are just waiting for the best opportunity to trap retail investors. Once spot trading starts, all the chips are gone, and this trick has been played out. The higher the community enthusiasm, the more dangerous it is; by then, retail investors will still be the ones holding the bag.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 01-08 15:51

Based on on-chain data, this logic has actually been locked in for a long time, just waiting for someone to dissect it thoroughly. Wait, have you noticed? The fact that 50% of the chips are held by large holders is itself quite interesting—looking at it from another angle, it's the same as a typical abnormal trading pattern related to funds. Before a coin is listed on an exchange, that "pre-listing inquiry" is essentially conducting thorough investigations, tracking multiple addresses to understand the true intentions of these large holders. Listing on spot markets = a liquidity explosion window. This logic is sound, but the question is—why are retail investors now more cautious? Isn't it because they’re afraid of being cut, with their sensitivity to suspicious wallet behaviors skyrocketing? Honestly, the reason why the violent dump strategies from the Pepe era are no longer playable isn’t because community building has become stronger, but because every large transfer is being watched and tracked in full view... that’s the real variable.

View OriginalReply0

LiquiditySurfer

· 01-08 15:47

Well... essentially, big players are waiting for the moment of deepest liquidity to strike, and exchanges are well aware of this, so they hold back. The more active the community, the more dangerous it becomes; this contrast is interesting.

View OriginalReply0

HackerWhoCares

· 01-08 15:47

It's all an illusion. The market manipulators seem to be providing opportunities for community development, but in reality, they are just laying out the path to dump their holdings.

View OriginalReply0

ForkMonger

· 01-08 15:43

nah this is just governance theater, real talk—exchanges literally orchestrating the pump-dump cycle while pretending to care about "community health." classic protocol economics dressed up as market caution.

Reply0

ChainBrain

· 01-08 15:35

Ah, basically it's a psychological game between the big players and retail investors. As soon as spot trading starts, they dump the market. This trick is really too old. So now exchanges have to ask around in advance to see if anyone is willing to "talk about the bigger picture," it's hilarious. The more the community hyped it up, the more dangerous it becomes. They're just waiting for that moment to run collectively.

View OriginalReply0

VitaliksTwin

· 01-08 15:23

Basically, it's just the big players and exchanges playing a game of tacit understanding, with retail investors as spectators. Before listing a coin, they first "persuade" the big investors to exit, so it doesn't look too bad when it crashes right after listing. This logic is brilliant. The higher the community enthusiasm, the more dangerous it actually is. That's the real truth. As for the concentration of chips, industry insiders can’t be fooled at all; exchanges have long figured it out. Wait, those projects that are still falling after going live on spot markets—can we reverse engineer the big investor structure from that?

View OriginalReply0