February 25 News: The Delhi High Court recently dismissed a lawsuit filed by a group of cryptocurrency investors against a certain crypto platform. Judge Prushaindra Kumar Kaurav stated that the platform is a private company and does not meet the definition of a “state” entity under Article 12 of the Constitution. Therefore, it cannot be subject to judicial intervention under Article 226, and the petition lacks a legal basis for acceptance.
The lawsuit was initiated by investors including Rana Handa and Aditya Malhotra, requesting the court to strengthen regulation of the crypto platform, and to direct the CBI or a special investigation team to investigate. They also asked for the freezing of user funds that were reportedly restricted. However, the court clearly indicated that ordering a criminal investigation is an extremely special circumstance, and some complaints have not even completed the FIR process, which is insufficient to trigger a mandatory investigation.
The core dispute in the case concerns withdrawal restrictions. Several users reported difficulty in withdrawing funds from the platform since 2025, with issues such as account valuation discrepancies and limit adjustments. Rana Handa told the court that he invested approximately 1.422 million rupees in 2021, but subsequent withdrawal obstacles led to widespread doubts about the platform’s liquidity and compliance. Affected investors had previously filed complaints through the National Cyber Crime Portal and eventually turned to legal channels to seek justice.
The court also emphasized that the regulation of cryptocurrencies falls under legislative and policy matters, which should be formulated by Parliament and regulatory agencies such as RBI and SEBI, rather than by the judiciary proactively creating rules. In the absence of clear regulations, the court prefers to guide parties to resolve disputes through traditional legal pathways such as civil lawsuits, consumer complaints, or police reports.
From an industry perspective, this ruling highlights the legal gray area caused by the still-developing crypto regulatory framework in India. For investors facing frozen funds, withdrawal difficulties, or platform disputes, obtaining quick relief through constitutional litigation becomes significantly more challenging. Legal experts generally agree that this decision follows existing constitutional principles but also amplifies concerns about the lack of crypto asset regulation, investor fund safety risks, and platform compliance reviews. It is expected that legislative discussions and regulatory policy battles will continue to intensify into 2026.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Brazil's Crypto Faction Prepare to Fight Stablecoin Taxation in Congress
The crypto faction in the Brazilian Congress is expecting the issuance of a decree to establish a 3.5% tax on stablecoin transactions to file a draft bill and block this initiative. The Parliamentary Front for the Free Market argues that the measure would constitute an overreach of the Executive
Coinpedia6m ago
Lummis pushes for crypto tax exemptions before stepping down, CLARITY bill stalemate remains unresolved
Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis is advocating for tax exemptions on cryptocurrency transactions under $300 to promote everyday use of cryptocurrencies. However, the CLARITY Act faces obstacles in the Senate, mainly due to regulatory disputes over crypto token stocks and opposition from the banking industry. With Lummis stepping down soon, the legislative prospects remain uncertain.
MarketWhisper34m ago
U.S. CFTC Chair Outlines Future Priorities: Clarifying Crypto Regulations, Ending Regulatory Disputes with SEC, and More
CFTC Chairman Mike Selig stated at the conference that the United States is experiencing a technological revolution driven by AI and blockchain, emphasizing the need to adjust the regulatory framework to adapt to changes. Key areas include derivatives market regulation, addressing legacy issues in legislation, clarifying the classification of crypto contracts, and prioritizing agricultural and energy needs.
GateNews41m ago
U.S. banking industry plans to sue OCC over blocking crypto licenses, BPI says regulatory rules are being distorted
The US banking industry is considering filing a lawsuit against the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) because the OCC has granted national trust bank charters to cryptocurrency and fintech companies. BPI believes this move is illegal and has led to regulatory unfairness. Opposing voices include the Banking Association and state regulators, who argue that this measure could bypass traditional regulation. The OCC has approved licenses for multiple crypto companies, but this has sparked controversy, especially with applications from companies related to the Trump family drawing congressional scrutiny. If the lawsuit succeeds, it could impact the compliance status of crypto companies and the regulatory framework.
MarketWhisper1h ago
What is the impact of the SEC's issuance of interpretive guidance promoting a "Token Classification Framework" on the cryptocurrency industry?
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has submitted new interpretive guidance on crypto assets, planning to establish a token classification framework to clearly define which crypto assets are securities and their related regulatory requirements. The guidance aims to fill legislative gaps and influence the operational models of crypto companies. As the global digital asset market develops, the U.S. regulatory framework is moving towards institutionalization, which could change global regulatory trends.
区块客1h ago
Moldova investigates cases of cryptocurrency interference in parliamentary elections involving a total of $107 million
Moldova's National Anti-Corruption Center has disclosed a plan to influence the 2025 parliamentary elections using cryptocurrency, involving a total amount of $107 million. The funds are transferred through non-custodial crypto wallets to intermediaries, who then exchange them for cash to bribe voters and promote candidates. The source of the funds is mainly from crypto platforms in Russia and Kyrgyzstan.
GateNews2h ago
