2025lovepeace

By the end of 2025, the Ethereum network reaches a critical turning point: the validator "enter queue" reverses and surpasses the "exit queue." This means that after months of market testing, the amount of funds attempting to stake Ethereum to become validators has far exceeded the amount of funds seeking to unstake and exit. This change is not just a numerical shift but a market sentiment and network fundamentals indicator, signaling that the prolonged selling pressure over several months is gradually easing. It also suggests that, driven by factors such as some institutional confidence returning, Pectra upgrades and optimizations, and DeFi leverage unwinding, the Ethereum network is entering a new cycle of enhanced security and capital accumulation.
Ethereum Validator Queue reversal: According to the latest data from the Ethereum Validator Queue, approximately 739,824 ETH are currently waiting in line to enter the network, with an estimated wait time of 12 days and 20 hours; the exit queue holds only 349,867 ETH, which will take about 6 days to clear.
Cryptocurrency exchanges: Additionally, the current total staked ETH on Ethereum is about 35.5 million ETH, accounting for 29.27% of the total supply, with active validators reaching 983,600.
What is the validator queue? Why is it important? Under Ethereum's Proof of Stake (PoS) mechanism, to ensure consensus stability, the protocol stipulates that nodes cannot join or leave at will but are regulated through a "Churn Limit" mechanism. Currently, each epoch (about 6 minutes)

Cryptocurrency and blockchain technology remain a global phenomenon, with use cases in almost every corner of the world. Digital technology has become so popular that it is not only a significant topic in finance but also in politics and governance. The seven "Stans" of Central and South Asia—Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan—have not avoided the proliferation of digital technology. Whether it is Afghanistan using blockchain technology to revitalize its healthcare sector or Kazakhstan waiving taxes on cryptocurrency mining, the application of digital technology holds a place in these countries. Attitudes toward blockchain in these nations Some stakeholders believe that more work is needed if the region is to reach the same level of crypto and blockchain business as East Asia and Southeast Asia. Pakistan government explores digital policies The State Bank of Pakistan, the central bank of Pakistan, has banned the use of cryptocurrencies in the country. Like India, local stakeholders within the cryptocurrency community are attempting to overturn the ban. Waqir Zaka, co-founder of blockchain-based venture capital startup TenUp, is one of the opponents of Pakistan's cryptocurrency ban. Zaka appeared earlier this week before the Sindh High Court to challenge the central bank's ban. According to local media ProPakistani, the SHC instructed the country's Federal Investigation Agency to assist the court in understanding cryptocurrencies and to make a fair and just ruling on the matter. On December 5, Zaka posted

Central Asia, South Asia, and Oceania (cryptocurrency exchanges) have the world's most dynamic and attractive cryptocurrency markets. Based on raw trading volume, Central Asia and Oceania are the third-largest cryptocurrency markets we studied, behind North America and Central, Northern, and Western Europe (CNWE), accounting for less than 20% of global trading volume. India leads in trading volume, receiving approximately $268.9 billion in crypto assets during the study period. However, raw trading volume doesn't tell the whole story. When considering purchasing power and population to gauge grassroots adoption, cryptocurrency exchanges dominate. We see this reflected in the Global Cryptocurrency Adoption Index, where six of the top ten countries are in this region: India (1), Vietnam (3), Philippines (6), Indonesia (7), Pakistan (8), and Thailand (10). Additionally, last year, DeFi played a more significant role in cryptocurrency exchanges, accounting for an estimated 55.8% of regional trading volume from July 2022 to June 2023, up from 35.2% in the same period the previous year. The region's institutional adoption also appears to have increased, with 68.8% of total transactions coming from transfers of $1 million or more, compared to 57.6% previously. But importantly, in terms of cryptocurrency adoption, cryptocurrency exchanges are not monolithic. In different cryptocurrency exchange countries, the driving adoption

The cryptocurrency venture capital market is undergoing a quiet transformation. According to the latest funding data from DefiLlama, among the 73 projects that completed over $10 million in funding in the past three months, almost no Layer 1 and Layer 2 public chains are present. The public chain track, once considered the "Holy Grail," has now nearly disappeared. Meanwhile, prediction markets, payment systems, RWA (Real World Assets), and infrastructure aimed at ordinary users are attracting significant capital inflows. The L1 and L2 hype has subsided, and large-scale AI funding has also nearly cooled down. Reflecting on the peak of the 2021-2022 bull market, new public chains like Solana, Avalanche, and Fantom often raised hundreds of millions of dollars, with investors rushing to bet on "Ethereum killers." However, three years later, the market landscape has fundamentally changed. From Movement and Story to this year's Berachain and Monad, large-scale funding for public chains has lost its former glory. According to data from The Block, the total blockchain network (including L1 and L2) funding in 2024 is approximately $1.8 billion. While still an important track, the growth rate has significantly slowed. Based on statistics from user @pgreyy on X, in Q4 2025, apart from Tempo, supported by Paradigm (a new public chain focused solely on payments), no other...

USDT and Coin Cryptocurrency Exchange P2P are very popular. I ask the same set of questions in every event: Who pays wages with cryptocurrency? Who pays wages in local currency? Who prefers to pay in Bitcoin/Ethereum? Who prefers stablecoins? Who is actively using Coin Cryptocurrency Exchange's P2P market? In all events, almost all participants' answers are quite consistent: they have received wages in cryptocurrency before. They prefer to pay in stablecoins, especially USDT. They use Coin Cryptocurrency Exchange's P2P market to convert stablecoins into local currency (and vice versa). There is little interest in holding local crypto assets like Bitcoin or Ethereum. Additionally, participants prefer to trade on networks like TRON or Binance Smart Chain. The reason is: almost no fees and confirmation times are "fast." Coin Cryptocurrency Exchange is very popular. Although competitors like onboard are emerging, almost all participants still rely on Coin Cryptocurrency Exchange as their preferred trading platform. Someone explained to me that Coin Cryptocurrency Exchange entered Africa around 2018 and established the Coin Cryptocurrency Exchange Labs. At that time, there was potential interest, but no expansion plans. Over time, Coin Cryptocurrency Exchange realized that Africans wanted access to stablecoins, making Africa an important market for the company. I saw some locals wearing Coin Cryptocurrency Exchange shirts.

China accuses the United States of not only stealing the Lubian hacking incident but also possibly orchestrating it, then justifying the theft by claiming to "confiscate Chen Zhi's illegal assets," thereby legitimizing the act. China alleges that the US used the Chen Zhi case to steal $13 billion worth of Bitcoin. Vietnam cryptocurrency exchange China accuses the US of using the Chen Zhi case to confiscate $13 billion worth of Bitcoin. China has just made a serious accusation, claiming that the US government is behind the scenes. 127,000 Bitcoins were stolen in December 2020 and directly confiscated from Chen Zhi's Lubei Mine. The chairman of the Cambodian Prince Group, with a net worth exceeding $13 billion at current prices. If true, this would be the largest state-sponsored cyberattack in the cryptocurrency industry and could trigger a "cryptocurrency Cold War" between the two superpowers, the US and China. According to a recent technical report released by China's National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center (CVERC), the details of the incident have been reconstructed: - In late December 2020, Chen Zhi's Lubei Mine was attacked. Over 127,272 Bitcoins were stolen, worth about $3.5 billion at the time. The tools and techniques used in this attack far exceeded the capabilities of ordinary hackers, and only organizations with national-level technical expertise could have achieved it. - After the hacker attack, the stolen Bitcoin remained almost untouched for four years. By mid-2024, all the Bitcoin had been transferred to a new wallet and has since been dormant. ——Arkam Intelligence Agency End

dYdX The protocol will allocate 75% of its revenue to buy back DYDX tokens on the open market, which is almost unprecedented in the DeFi space. Multiple analyses suggest that this buyback could absorb up to 5% of the total supply annually, causing significant token scarcity and positioning DYDX among a select few tokens truly supported by revenue. The dYdX community approved Proposal 313 with 59.38% voting in favor, officially approving an increase in the token buyback ratio from 25% to 75% of net revenue. The program will begin implementing the buyback plan in March 2025. Under the new distribution structure, the protocol’s net revenue will be allocated as follows: 75% to directly buy back DYDX on the open market for staking rather than idle holding; 5% for the operations, management, and strategy of the Treasury sub-DAO; 5% will be transferred to MegaVault—the fund currently underperforming (annual return -16.7%) and in need of a more reasonable compensation mechanism. Currently, 85% of the revenue is used to serve the ecosystem, rather than being in a “one-way” state as before. Despite the positive outlook of the buyback news, the DYDX price dropped sharply by 2% on the same day. The overall market trend during the Friday weekend, and a 56% decline since September 2025. The price fluctuation of DYDX over the past year, screenshot from CoinGecko, timestamped November 14, 2025, 10:30 AM. This may be due to…

VBSN——The blockchain infrastructure behind it. Cryptocurrency exchanges in Vietnam are integrating blockchain technology into the VNeID system. Vietnam has officially incorporated blockchain technology into its national electronic identification application, VNeID, enabling practical application in national governance. Therefore, the Ministry of Public Security now directly applies blockchain technology to VNeID to trace the sources of precursors and chemicals, an area requiring high regulation, transparency, and compliance. Recent reports show that the application of blockchain on Vietnam's national ID (VNeID) is not limited to administrative management but is expanding to integrate important digital services for citizens and enterprises, aiming to form a unified national digital platform. During a meeting summarizing the one-year implementation of government action plans, these points were emphasized. The 57-NQ/TW resolution. This event was held to commemorate the 5th anniversary of national administrative reform and the 4th anniversary of the "06 Project," on December 18, hosted by the Prime Minister, who is also the Chair of the Digital Transformation and "06 Project" Development Steering Committee. The integration of blockchain into VNeID is backed by Vietnam's Multi-Chain Blockchain Service Network. VBSN, the National Shared Blockchain Infrastructure, was built according to the initial strategic direction of the Ministry of Science and Technology. After long-term systematic development, VBSN has completed its technical infrastructure and entered the stage of large-scale deployment, becoming the backbone network of blockchain for the public sector. As of October this year, just 10 months after receiving government tasks, V

Strengthening discipline but with conditional relaxation of restrictions. Cryptocurrency exchanges in Russia outline the crypto legal framework to be implemented starting in 2026. The Central Bank of Russia has just announced a new legal framework proposal for cryptocurrencies, which is expected to be implemented from 2026 and fully completed by 2027, marking a significant shift in Moscow's tough stance on digital assets. According to the proposal, both individual and institutional investors can access cryptocurrencies through licensed platforms, but must pass knowledge tests, adhere to trading restrictions, and face strict penalties for violations. The Central Bank of Russia emphasizes that openness does not mean encouraging speculation. The agency also warns that cryptocurrencies are not issued or guaranteed by any country, are highly volatile, and face risks of international sanctions. In a statement, the Central Bank of Russia said: “Investors need to understand that when deciding to invest in crypto assets, they will bear all the risks of loss.” One of the reiterated core boundaries is that cryptocurrencies and stablecoins are only recognized as monetary assets; they can be bought, held, and traded but cannot be used as a means of payment domestically. Clearly, even if Russia accepts cryptocurrencies as investment tools, it remains committed to maintaining the ruble's exclusive position in its domestic payment system. Under the proposed framework, ordinary Russian citizens can buy and sell cryptocurrencies through licensed intermediaries. The annual limit for non-professional investors to purchase cryptocurrencies through each intermediary is 300,000 rubles (approximately $3,300), provided they pass a risk awareness test. Professional investors

The integration of blockchain and video games is bringing promising transformations to the industry. In today's article, we will trace the development of video games over the past 70 years, from their inception to today, exploring the role and position of blockchain technology in this field. The future of blockchain and the video game industry. History of the video game industry Source: Visual Capitalist
1950s: The First Video Game Console
Digital Currency and Crypto Exchanges: The Future of Blockchain and the Video Game Industry
In the early 1950s, the term "video game" was not yet widely known. One significant advancement was the emergence of the first video game console, developed by scientist William Higinbotham in 1958 at Brookhaven National Laboratory in the United States. This device, called "Tennis for Two," used a CRT display to show a simple tennis game. Players interacted with the game via a control panel. However, this game console was merely an experimental project and did not see widespread development or adoption.
During this period, video game consoles were mainly produced by research teams and universities, typically used only in laboratories and special events.
1970s: The Rise of Computer Games
In the 1970s, as developers focused on creating games for personal computers, a major breakthrough in video games occurred. In 1972, Atari launched its first game, "Pong," which sparked a gaming craze on black-and-white screens. They successfully brought video games from laboratories into the hands of the masses. The trend of diversification in video games began to spread, from "Space