#以太坊大户持仓变化 Ethereum wants to be the operating system of the digital world? Vitalik Buterin recently threw out this analogy, saying Ethereum needs to learn from Linux — open source, free, ubiquitous, yet quietly supporting billions of devices globally. The community exploded over this.
**The vision sounds reasonable**
According to the plan, the Ethereum mainnet (L1) should become the foundation of digital society. Finance, identity, social, governance — all core functions requiring trust and sovereignty should be built on top of it. The Ethereum Foundation's goal is clear: make it the operating system of the internet, with value, computation, and consensus all running on it.
Sounds grand, right? Here comes the problem.
**But the backyard is in chaos**
Today the Ethereum ecosystem is stacked with 127 Layer 2 scaling chains. Theoretically this is good — each L2 is designed to solve slow transaction speeds and high fees. Reality?
The track is extremely crowded, but traffic and revenue are concentrated in just a handful of leading chains. Most L2s get nothing, with revenue plummeting and days getting harder. More painfully, so many chains actually destroy user experience — cross-chain asset transfers are complex, each chain operates independently, turning into data silos with no interconnection.
So the problem emerges: are these 127 L2s helping Ethereum scale, or undermining it? There's an invisible gulf between the ideal of an operating system and the reality of the ecosystem.
Trang này có thể chứa nội dung của bên thứ ba, được cung cấp chỉ nhằm mục đích thông tin (không phải là tuyên bố/bảo đảm) và không được coi là sự chứng thực cho quan điểm của Gate hoặc là lời khuyên về tài chính hoặc chuyên môn. Xem Tuyên bố từ chối trách nhiệm để biết chi tiết.
12 thích
Phần thưởng
12
5
Đăng lại
Retweed
Bình luận
0/400
ShadowStaker
· 2giờ trước
Nah, so sánh Linux có vẻ hơi lệch lạc thật sự... Linux thực ra có kiến trúc *nhất quán* lmao, sự phân mảnh của 127 L2s hét vào hư không này giống như... địa ngục plugin Windows 95 nhưng biến nó thành blockchain
Xem bản gốcTrả lời0
SlowLearnerWang
· 01-08 17:00
Huh... 127 L2s? Điều đó phải là mức độ cạnh tranh cao đến mức nào đây, cảm giác có chút phi lý rồi
Xem bản gốcTrả lời0
RugpullSurvivor
· 01-08 16:55
127 chuỗi riêng rẽ, chẳng phải là phân mảnh sao? Làm sao còn có thể thành hệ điều hành chứ
Xem bản gốcTrả lời0
NFTBlackHole
· 01-08 16:33
127条L2 vẫn đang tranh chấp, nhưng hệ sinh thái đã sớm phân chia. Nghe có vẻ hoành tráng, nhưng làm thì chỉ là một mớ hỗn độn.
Xem bản gốcTrả lời0
ChainMelonWatcher
· 01-08 16:33
127 lớp L2 giống như xếp hình, một khi đổ thì tất cả đều đổ, vậy làm sao gọi là hệ điều hành được đây
#以太坊大户持仓变化 Ethereum wants to be the operating system of the digital world? Vitalik Buterin recently threw out this analogy, saying Ethereum needs to learn from Linux — open source, free, ubiquitous, yet quietly supporting billions of devices globally. The community exploded over this.
**The vision sounds reasonable**
According to the plan, the Ethereum mainnet (L1) should become the foundation of digital society. Finance, identity, social, governance — all core functions requiring trust and sovereignty should be built on top of it. The Ethereum Foundation's goal is clear: make it the operating system of the internet, with value, computation, and consensus all running on it.
Sounds grand, right? Here comes the problem.
**But the backyard is in chaos**
Today the Ethereum ecosystem is stacked with 127 Layer 2 scaling chains. Theoretically this is good — each L2 is designed to solve slow transaction speeds and high fees. Reality?
The track is extremely crowded, but traffic and revenue are concentrated in just a handful of leading chains. Most L2s get nothing, with revenue plummeting and days getting harder. More painfully, so many chains actually destroy user experience — cross-chain asset transfers are complex, each chain operates independently, turning into data silos with no interconnection.
So the problem emerges: are these 127 L2s helping Ethereum scale, or undermining it? There's an invisible gulf between the ideal of an operating system and the reality of the ecosystem.