Profits have pulled back, and I apologize to the brothers who copied my trades, but I have a question: why wasn't I liquidated when all the copiers were liquidated? Aren't their orders supposed to be placed at 1/10 of my position? In theory, shouldn't I be the one getting liquidated first, not them? Since I don't fully understand this either, I feel quite sorry for them. My profits only pulled back a bit, but I see they were all liquidated. I hope any brothers who see this message can send me their UID, and I'll compensate each person 10u. I still remain bullish on shorting. My biggest mistake was forgetting to set a stop loss. I want to learn from this—can any knowledgeable people explain to me why I still have a decent position despite having no stop loss set, while all the people copying my trades got liquidated? Because if they hadn't been liquidated, at worst they should only have experienced a pullback like mine, which we could recover in these next two days anyway. My live trading is public, so brothers can take a look too.

查看原文
post-image
post-image
【當前用戶分享了他的交易卡片,若想瞭解更多優質交易資訊,請到 App 版查看】
此頁面可能包含第三方內容,僅供參考(非陳述或保證),不應被視為 Gate 認可其觀點表述,也不得被視為財務或專業建議。詳見聲明
  • 打賞
  • 5
  • 轉發
  • 分享
回覆
請輸入回覆內容
請輸入回覆內容
ETH阿发
· 03-24 07:00
换个角度来说,我的本金是2500,跟单100u。如果我赚翻倍的话,他们只赚100u吧?那不就意味着我必须亏到爆仓,他们才会跟着爆仓吗?
查看原文回復0
查看更多