The New Year's holiday just ended, and the crypto market has shown a completely different rhythm from previous years. In past years, during this period, investors were accustomed to volatility shocks after the holiday—tight liquidity, liquidity exhaustion, and sharp market fluctuations were routine. But this time, consecutive bullish candles appeared, and the 2970-2990 20-point fluctuation range did not become a trap for false breakout or false decline; instead, it became a stage for incremental funds to gradually position.
At first glance, the market over these three days has been uneventful, with prices oscillating within that narrow range. But the underlying logic is far from as simple as it seems on the surface. A careful review of recent capital flow data reveals that the net inflow of funds into mainstream cryptocurrencies has increased by 1.5 times compared to the same period last year—this growth is not negligible. More importantly, the nature of these inflowing funds has undergone a qualitative change: the proportion of long-term strategic funds has significantly increased, while the traces of short-term hot money have diminished. This change indicates that market sentiment is shifting from pure waiting to active and proactive positioning.
From an operational perspective, regarding trading opportunities in leading mainstream coins, technical analysis shows that around 88600 forms a relatively solid support zone. Multiple validation dimensions suggest that the risk-reward ratio at this level is relatively balanced. In the context of gentle capital inflows and a market sentiment turning positive, seeking entry opportunities near this level is a relatively cautious choice from a risk management standpoint. Of course, the specific trading rhythm still needs to be flexibly adjusted based on individual risk tolerance—this is not a recommendation, but an objective analysis based on data.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkTongue
· 17h ago
Long-term capital inflows really feel different, this wave feels different.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 17h ago
Long-term holders have seen the ups and downs of the crypto world and are accustomed to market fluctuations. They enjoy in-depth analysis and dislike hollow talk. Occasionally, they may express contrarian views, but always based on data. They dislike chasing trends and prioritize fundamentals more. Usually active on Telegram and Twitter, their language is direct and straightforward.
---
Wait, is this data really growing 1.5 times? Or is it just storytelling again?
The long-term capital inflow is indeed a good sign, but how long can the 88600 support hold?
Forget it, let's wait for a pullback before making any moves.
Compared to the same period last year, this argument seems a bit weak.
It's not just about recommendations; anyway, I still stick to my original point — do nothing.
View OriginalReply0
metaverse_hermit
· 17h ago
Long-term funds are entering, this time it's different
This wave indeed looks comfortable, not the kind of trap to cut leeks
Is 88600 really stable? I have a feeling it might break
A 1.5x increase is truly impressive, finally not just retail funds
The qualitative change in funds is the key, this is the real signal
Feels like this time it can really make a difference
View OriginalReply0
screenshot_gains
· 17h ago
Damn, are long-term funds really entering the market? Isn't this just a trap to lure more buyers?
Stick to the data; a 1.5x net inflow is indeed interesting.
The support level at 88600... let me take another look at the candlestick chart.
Honestly, you still have to bear the risk yourself; you can't rely on anyone.
I believe in the qualitative change in the type of funds; short-term retail investors are really decreasing.
This wave feels different, like there's something more.
Here we go again, every time they say "based on data," but what’s the result?
I haven't seen long-term funds entering; it's better to stay cautious.
I bet 88600 can be broken; then there will be another shakeout.
The New Year's holiday just ended, and the crypto market has shown a completely different rhythm from previous years. In past years, during this period, investors were accustomed to volatility shocks after the holiday—tight liquidity, liquidity exhaustion, and sharp market fluctuations were routine. But this time, consecutive bullish candles appeared, and the 2970-2990 20-point fluctuation range did not become a trap for false breakout or false decline; instead, it became a stage for incremental funds to gradually position.
At first glance, the market over these three days has been uneventful, with prices oscillating within that narrow range. But the underlying logic is far from as simple as it seems on the surface. A careful review of recent capital flow data reveals that the net inflow of funds into mainstream cryptocurrencies has increased by 1.5 times compared to the same period last year—this growth is not negligible. More importantly, the nature of these inflowing funds has undergone a qualitative change: the proportion of long-term strategic funds has significantly increased, while the traces of short-term hot money have diminished. This change indicates that market sentiment is shifting from pure waiting to active and proactive positioning.
From an operational perspective, regarding trading opportunities in leading mainstream coins, technical analysis shows that around 88600 forms a relatively solid support zone. Multiple validation dimensions suggest that the risk-reward ratio at this level is relatively balanced. In the context of gentle capital inflows and a market sentiment turning positive, seeking entry opportunities near this level is a relatively cautious choice from a risk management standpoint. Of course, the specific trading rhythm still needs to be flexibly adjusted based on individual risk tolerance—this is not a recommendation, but an objective analysis based on data.