Bitcoin drops over 30% in two months, Satoshi Nakamoto's wealth evaporates by $43 billion

BTC3,6%

As of late October to early November 2025, Bitcoin’s price plummeted more than 30% from its all-time high, causing the notional value of early miner and mysterious founder Satoshi Nakamoto’s 1.1 million BTC to evaporate by over $42 billion within weeks. On-chain analytics indicate Satoshi’s holdings shrank from roughly $138.9 billion to about $96.1 billion, dropping his global wealth ranking to 20th worldwide.

This Bitcoin price volatility has not only reignited market debate over the “Patoshi pattern,” Satoshi’s identity, and the ownership of the Bitcoin stash, but also brought the potential threat of quantum computing to Bitcoin private keys back into the spotlight. With the 2026 release of the documentary “Killing Satoshi,” this fortune, dormant for 15 years, has become a focal point for the global crypto ecosystem and financial sector.

Bitcoin Price Crash Accelerates Satoshi’s Wealth Shrinkage: 1.1 Million BTC in Flux

Over the past several weeks, Bitcoin has experienced its largest correction since the 2024 bull market. On-chain data shows that after peaking at $126,296 on October 6, 2025, the price quickly dropped to around $87,390—a decline of over 30%. For investors, this meant a sharp decrease in notional assets, but for Satoshi, who holds 1.1 million BTC, the loss was staggering.

On-chain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence points out that the early address group inferred by the “Patoshi pattern” remains unmoved, and these assets have suffered the full brunt of the price drop. According to their calculations, Satoshi’s Bitcoin wealth dropped from $138.9 billion to about $96.1 billion, a decline of roughly $42.79 billion in the short term—making it a significant case study for Bitcoin price volatility.

Despite the massive paper loss, the market’s long-term view of Bitcoin’s scarcity remains unchanged. Strategists argue that the long-term immobility of early coins creates a “supply freeze effect,” reducing circulating supply and supporting Bitcoin’s long-term value. This structural factor is seen as key in Bitcoin supply and demand analysis.

At current market prices, if Satoshi’s wealth were included in the global rich list, he would rank around 20th, just below Bill Gates and above the Françoise Bettencourt Meyers family. However, due to the inability to verify his legal identity, he is not officially ranked.

Key Data on Satoshi’s Wealth (2025)

  • Number of Bitcoins Held: 1.1 million
  • Price Peak Date: October 6, 2025
  • Bitcoin All-Time High: $126,296
  • Peak Valuation: $138.92 billion
  • Current Valuation: $96.129 billion
  • Notional Loss: $42.79 billion
  • Wealth Ranking (if included): 20th in the world

Patoshi Pattern Back in the Spotlight: Early Bitcoin Address Ownership and Dormancy Mystery

The sharp Bitcoin price swings have refocused attention on the “Patoshi pattern.” Proposed by Bitcoin researcher Sergio Lerner, this pattern analyzes block times, nonce distribution, and early mining behavior to infer that roughly 22,000 addresses are controlled by a single entity, widely believed to be Satoshi Nakamoto.

These early addresses have the following characteristics:

  1. Mining activity concentrated in Bitcoin’s earliest days
  2. Regular, non-random block production
  3. No transfers or key updates for 15 years

These features have helped researchers estimate Satoshi’s potential holdings but have also sparked debate over whether the assets are lost. Some community members believe the coins’ immobility means the owner has no intention to sell, while others suspect the private keys are lost, or even that Satoshi may no longer be alive.

On-chain transparency makes this Bitcoin stash one of the most scrutinized fortunes globally, yet its silence is unique. In traditional finance, large frozen assets typically involve regulatory or legal intervention, but in a decentralized system, address dormancy is more like a black box.

Dormant assets also reinforce Bitcoin’s supply squeeze effect, making the actual tradable supply lower than the theoretical maximum of 21 million. During demand upcycles, such static large holdings are seen as bullish for the market.

Wealth Not Included in Global Rich Lists: Identity, Legitimacy, and Statistical Dilemmas

Despite Satoshi’s vast notional wealth, mainstream organizations like Forbes have not included him in their official rankings. The reasons: inability to confirm if Satoshi is a single person, if he is still alive, or if he has legal identity. Bitcoin’s early anonymity and lack of real-name registration make ownership unverifiable.

Some scholars call for a redesign of global wealth statistics, arguing that anonymous wallet addresses should be counted as traceable wealth, because:

  • Blockchain ledgers are transparent and asset sizes verifiable
  • Decentralized assets have global economic impact
  • Ignoring such assets biases wealth distribution statistics

However, long-dormant addresses make the usability of these assets unknown. If the private keys are unrecoverable, this wealth is effectively lost to the market, existing only symbolically. Academically, these are called “Lost Coins,” which have a profound impact on Bitcoin’s deflationary structure, but limited meaning for practical wealth assessment.

Quantum Threat and Future Controversy: Early Bitcoin Key Security Analysis

Quantum computing is a long-standing concern in the Bitcoin community. As quantum technology advances, some researchers worry that future devices may break early Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) encryption, posing a risk to unmoved Bitcoins.

Satoshi’s early addresses are particularly vulnerable, as their public key formats are more susceptible than modern wallets. Quantum threats could lead to:

  1. Public Key Exposure Risk: Some early addresses’ public keys are already visible on-chain
  2. Network-Wide Upgrade Challenges: Changing encryption algorithms requires a full node upgrade, which is technically demanding
  3. Ownership Disputes: If such addresses are attacked, whether to roll back via hard fork would be highly controversial

Countermeasures include:

  • Freezing certain addresses and upgrading the network as quantum threats become imminent
  • Or migrating to quantum-resistant algorithms (such as lattice cryptography) via soft fork

In the short term, these issues remain largely theoretical. But with the 2026 release of “Killing Satoshi,” the topic is entering mainstream discussion. The film explores the social impact of Bitcoin wealth, Satoshi’s identity, and global governance risks, bringing new attention to this unresolved case.

While Bitcoin’s wild price swings have sharply reduced Satoshi’s notional wealth, debates over identity, early address security, and quantum threats persist. These 1.1 million dormant Bitcoins symbolize not only market sentiment but also the origin and enduring mystery of the Bitcoin ecosystem. On the road to a quantum-resistant future, Satoshi’s holdings remain one of the most symbolic fortunes in global finance.

FAQ

Why isn’t Satoshi included in the global rich list?

Because Satoshi lacks legal identity confirmation and may not be a single living person, mainstream wealth organizations do not include him in official rankings.

Is it certain that the 1.1 million Bitcoins belong to Satoshi?

On-chain analysis using the “Patoshi pattern” strongly infers ownership, but cannot confirm it 100%. Bitcoin cannot prove the real-world identity of private key holders.

Do Satoshi’s Bitcoins affect market liquidity?

Since these addresses have not moved, the actual circulating supply is reduced—bullish in the long term. If they were suddenly moved, it would cause a market shock.

Can quantum computing crack early Bitcoin private keys?

It is nearly impossible in the short term, but there is a theoretical risk in the long term. The academic and developer communities are researching quantum-resistant solutions.

If Bitcoin rises to $320,000–$370,000, would Satoshi be the world’s richest person?

In theory, yes, but he still would not appear on official rankings.

View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

South Korea Police Agency Sets First-Ever Dark Coin Management Guidelines, Virtual Assets Compressed by Approximately 54.5 Billion Korean Won Over Past 5 Years

Korea's National Police Agency completes draft virtual asset management directive, first time including dark coin management and clarifying software wallet solutions. Over the past 5 years, virtual assets worth approximately 54.5 billion won have been seized, with police planning to select private custodian institutions. Experts recommend establishing a government-led custody system.

GateNews12m ago

BTC falls below 75000 USDT, intraday decline of 0.16%

Gate News reports that on March 17, Bitcoin fell below the 75,000 USDT level, currently trading at 74,994.01 USDT, with an intraday decline of 0.16%.

GateNews15m ago

Liquid Capital Founder Yi Lihua: Going All-In on Rebound, BTC Rebound to $85,000-$90,000 is a Reasonable Range

Liquid Capital founder Yi Lihua stated that he is preparing a new fund and adopting a full-position strategy to capitalize on rebounds, believing that BTC rebounding to $85,000 and $90,000 is reasonable. He shared his experience of over a decade in the crypto industry, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a positive mindset and conducting oneself with integrity.

GateNews34m ago

Slippage: The Most Underestimated Profit Killer in Trading

Author: CryptoPunk Many crypto traders have experienced the same disappointment: strategies that appear stable and profitable in backtests quickly see their returns shrink when actually deployed, sometimes turning from profit into loss. The issue is often not "misjudging the direction," but underestimating trading costs, especially slippage. In crypto markets where bull and bear phases switch more rapidly, volatility is more intense, and order books are more fragmented, slippage is not a trivial decimal point—it is the real threshold that determines whether a strategy can survive. A deviation of just 2 or 3 basis points can, in high-turnover strategies, completely wipe out the theoretical alpha. Based on long-term backtests of BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT, this article aims to answer a very practical question: to what extent does slippage erode strategy returns, and which strategies are most likely to be killed by slippage? 1. Introduction: Why Slippage

PANews39m ago

Yesterday, Bitcoin spot ETF net inflows amounted to $199 million, with BlackRock's IBIT inflows of $139 million.

On March 16, Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded total net inflows of $199 million, with BlackRock's IBIT leading at $139 million in inflows, Fidelity's FBTC at $64.53 million, while Ark's ARKB and VanEck's HODL saw outflows of $3.07 million and $6.28 million respectively.

GateNews50m ago

10x Research: Bitcoin's Current Rally May Be Driven by Massive Bearish Options Unwinding

Bitcoin's rise was primarily driven by put option sellers at the $55,000 and $60,000 levels, with traders closing positions forcing market makers to buy Bitcoin. The rally lacked bullish call buying, though Bitcoin broke through $76,000 today, pushing the crypto market higher.

GateNews52m ago
Comment
0/400
No comments