Why Ethereum and Stablecoins Aren’t Safe for Crypto Laundering in 2026

LiveBTCNews
ETH0,34%
USDC-0,01%
BTC-0,59%
RUNE0,37%

Crypto laundering in 2026 evolves beyond mixers, with Ethereum, stablecoins, and bridges being risky choices for illicit activities.

Crypto laundering is evolving in 2026. While many still think mixers are the safest option, that’s no longer the case.

Advanced criminals have moved beyond simple techniques, using more sophisticated methods.

Ethereum and stablecoins, once popular for laundering, now carry significant risks due to their vulnerabilities.

The Risks of Using Ethereum and Stablecoins for Laundering

Ethereum and stablecoins like USDT and USDC are not ideal for long-term crypto laundering.

These assets rely on centralized structures, allowing issuers to freeze funds at any time.

The issuers of USDT and USDC control the tokens and can halt transactions when necessary Ethereum also faces challenges, as validators can censor transactions on the network.

For laundering, assets that can be censored or frozen are dangerous.

Holding funds in Ethereum or stablecoins means the risk of having assets blocked.

This centralization exposes criminals to greater risk, making these assets unreliable for illicit activities.

The Dangers of Using Bridges in Crypto Laundering

Bridges are another risky option for laundering funds across different blockchains.

When funds move from Ethereum to Bitcoin, multisig wallets still control many bridges.

This centralized control allows operators to freeze transactions, creating major risks for large fund transfers.

This centralization undermines the privacy and security needed for illicit activities.

🚨HOW CRYPTO LAUNDERING ACTUALLY WORKS IN 2026. 🚨

There’s a lazy myth that mixers make funds untraceable. At scale, that’s false.

For groups like Lazarus Group, mixers are a liability. The real game is chain hopping.

  1. Don’t hold censorable assets

ETH and stablecoins are… pic.twitter.com/xFKmGKhNw9

— chrisdior.eth (@chrisdior777) January 20, 2026

Though bridges enable cross-chain transactions, they expose funds to additional risks.

Centralized control over these bridges could allow authorities to freeze assets. As a result, criminals seeking to launder large amounts of money find bridges unreliable and unsafe.

Why THORChain Is Becoming the Go-To for Launderers

THORChain stands out by offering a decentralized solution to cross-chain transactions.

Unlike traditional systems that use bridges or wrapped tokens, which rely on centralized trust, THORChain uses validators who bond $RUNE to secure vaults.

This ensures no single validator can control the network, and everyone runs their own infrastructure for added security.

A key feature of THORChain is its Validator Churning system. Every 2.5 days, nodes rotate, keeping the network dynamic and secure.

This constant change ensures funds are always spendable and prevents any validator from gaining too much control.

ELI5: What makes THORChain different? 🧠
Most cross chain solutions use bridges (trust a few people) or wrapped tokens (trust a company).

THORChain’s unique innovations:

🔐 Capped Proof of Bond Validators bond $RUNE to secure vaults. No single validator can dominate. No… pic.twitter.com/dpnV3XK8L9

— THORChain (@THORChain) January 20, 2026

The Bifrost Protocol allows THORChain to connect to multiple chain types, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Cosmos.

This eliminates the need for custom bridges, enabling seamless, native asset swaps like $BTC to $ETH.

The protocol ensures secure, fair transactions based on real usage, offering a decentralized solution for cross-chain interoperability.

Off-Chain Sales: The Final Step in the Laundering Process

After converting funds to Bitcoin, criminals often take the next step by exiting off-chain.

They typically use over-the-counter (OTC) desks in regions such as Southeast Asia or China.

These desks enable the sale of large Bitcoin amounts without attracting attention, keeping transactions discreet and difficult to trace.

This final step makes it harder for authorities to track the funds.

However, using OTC desks comes with a cost. To account for the risks, the illicit funds are often sold at a 15-20% discount.

This price spread is a result of the risks involved in selling Bitcoin through less transparent channels.

Despite this, it allows criminals to complete the laundering process while maintaining secrecy.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Bitcoin ETF Records $138.48M Daily Inflow While Ethereum ETF Sees Weekly Outflow of $95.35M

Gate News bot message, according to the March 12 update, Bitcoin ETFs recorded a 1-day net inflow of 1,965 BTC (approximately $138.48 million) and a 7-day net inflow of 321 BTC (approximately $22.65 million). Ethereum ETFs showed a 1-day net inflow of 19,243 ETH (approximately $39.99 million), but

GateNews32m ago

Zama and GSR Complete First Confidential OTC Transaction on Ethereum, Achieving On-Chain Sensitive Data Encryption Protection

Gate News reports that on March 12, Zama and crypto market maker GSR announced that they have completed the first confidential over-the-counter transaction on Ethereum based on the Zama protocol. The transaction achieved encrypted protection of sensitive data such as transaction size and fund flows on the public blockchain. Zama stated that the transaction aims to eliminate "privacy loopholes" for institutional participants caused by on-chain data transparency. Through fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) technology, transaction details remain encrypted on-chain while ensuring transaction verifiability and settlement finality.

GateNews43m ago

ETH 15-minute surge 0.94%: On-chain capital inflows and technical upgrade expectations resonate to drive gains

2026-03-12 15:15 to 2026-03-12 15:30 (UTC), ETH fluctuated within 1.15%, with price rising from 2047.22 USDT to 2070.72 USDT, achieving +0.94% gains. During the same period, market attention increased, trading volume expanded significantly, volatility enhanced compared to daily levels, and on-chain activity and capital flow data expanded synchronously, indicating concentrated efforts from bullish forces. The main driving forces behind this price movement stem from concentrated on-chain capital inflows and technical upgrade expectations resonance. On-chain data shows that during the anomaly period ETH activity

GateNews53m ago

DNA Fund associated wallet withdrew 11,067 ETH from a certain CEX 2 hours ago

Gate News Alert: On March 12, according to Lookonchain monitoring, a wallet (0x2b0d) associated with DNA Fund withdrew 11,067 ETH ($22.83 million) from a certain CEX 2 hours ago.

GateNews1h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments