Author: Jake Nyquist, Founder of Hook Protocol
Translation: Blockchain Knight
By 2026, major institutions will launch entirely new prediction markets.
From the past five years of competition between NFT and perpetual contract exchanges, we have already understood: differentiated products can quickly capture market share.
Although leading platforms currently hold advantages in liquidity and regulation, they carry heavy product and technical debt, making it difficult to respond flexibly to new entrants.
So how should new players compete? In my view, the differentiation in prediction markets revolves around seven key dimensions:
1. Product Quality
Founding teams can create differentiation through front-end user experience, API stability, development documentation, market structure, fee mechanisms, and more.
Most established platforms currently have obvious shortcomings: unreasonable tier settings, opaque fee rules, slow and unstable APIs, and single order types.
A high-quality user experience, especially services tailored for API algorithmic traders, is a lasting core advantage that can help even against channel-strong competitors to establish a foothold.
2. Asset Types and Market Selection
Currently, trading volume in prediction markets is mainly concentrated in sports betting and native crypto markets.
New exchanges can launch exclusive markets unavailable on other platforms. When combined with vertical strategy (point 7), this advantage can be further amplified.
3. Capital Efficiency
Capital efficiency determines how effectively traders can utilize collateral. There are two main approaches:
First, interest-earning collateral: not letting idle funds earn only government bond yields, but providing higher returns—similar to Lighter supporting LP deposits as collateral, and HyENA’s USDE margin perpetual contracts.
Second, margin mechanisms. Due to gap risk, the leverage value of prediction markets is generally underestimated. However, platforms can offer limited leverage for continuous markets or implement portfolio margining for hedging positions.
Exchanges can also subsidize lending pools or act as market-making counterparts to internalize gap risks, rather than passing losses onto users.
4. Oracles and Market Settlement
The reliability of oracles remains a systemic weakness in the industry. Settlement delays and incorrect results can significantly amplify trading risks.
Beyond improving stability, platforms can implement innovative oracle mechanisms: hybrid human-machine systems, zero-knowledge proof-based solutions, AI-driven context-aware oracles, unlocking new markets that traditional oracles cannot support.
5. Liquidity Provision
The survival of an exchange depends on liquidity. Viable paths include: paying for professional market makers, incentivizing regular users with tokens to provide liquidity, and adopting Hyperliquid’s HLP aggregated liquidity model.
Some platforms may also fully internalize liquidity, emulating FTX’s model of relying on Alameda as an internal trading team.
6. Regulatory Compliance
Kalshi, with its US regulatory approval, has achieved embedded distribution with Robinhood and Coinbase, capturing retail traffic that Polymarket cannot reach.
There are still many jurisdictions and regulatory frameworks to explore. Compliant prediction markets can unlock similar channels, such as adapting to US state gambling regulations.
7. Vertical vs. Horizontal Strategies
Horizontal Strategy: Similar to Hyperliquid in perpetual contracts, focusing on building top-tier underlying trading infrastructure, inviting third parties to develop front-ends and vertical scenarios, and encouraging ecosystem builders to add markets and develop revenue-generating front-ends (like Phantom).
Vertical Strategy: Represented by Lighter, which autonomously controls the front-end, launches mobile apps, and creates a seamless user experience, emphasizing integrated experience and direct user connection.
Polymarket’s resistance to deep embedded cooperation versus Kalshi’s open approach exemplifies the trade-offs between these two strategies.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
U.S. CFTC Issues First-Ever Predictive Market Manipulation Risk Guidance and Seeks Public Comment on Proposed Rules
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has issued guidance on prediction market manipulation risks, requiring exchanges to consult with regulators before launching markets susceptible to manipulation. The guidance indicates that if contracts contradict public interest, they may be blocked, and sports contracts should cooperate with leagues to prevent insider trading.
GateNews24m ago
Polymarket Explores Funding Round at $20B Valuation Amid Traffic Surge
Gate News bot message, Polymarket is exploring a new funding round at approximately $20B valuation. The platform has experienced rapid growth in web traffic, reaching 38.4M monthly visits and ranking #2 among major platforms.
GateNews6h ago
Polymarket predicts a 64% probability that the Backpack token's FDV will exceed $300 million on its first day of launch
Gate News, as of March 12, according to relevant page information, Polymarket displayed on March 13 that the probability of predicting "Backpack token's FDV exceeding $300 million on the first day of listing" is 64%, while the probability of FDV being greater than $500 million is 30%. Previously, Backpack announced that it will conduct a TGE (Token Generation Event) on March 23.
GateNews7h ago
CFTC Chair: Will Issue Regulatory Guidance for Prediction Markets to Establish Clear Rules for New Types of Event Contracts
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Mike Selig announced the release of clear guidance targeting prediction markets to help trading platforms understand CFTC expectations for new contracts, ensure transparent rules, and prevent market manipulation and abusive conduct.
GateNews11h ago
US CFTC Chair: Will Issue Clear Guidance on Prediction Markets to Prevent Manipulation and Insider Trading
US CFTC Chair Mike Selig released prediction market guidance aimed at helping trading platforms understand regulatory expectations to ensure transparent rules for new contracts and prevent manipulation and abuse. Additionally, a proposed rule prenotice will be released to establish clear rules of conduct for new markets.
GateNews11h ago
Utah HB243 Bill Defines Prediction Markets as Gambling, Kalshi Files Federal Lawsuit
Utah HB243 bill classifies "proposition betting" as gambling and is expected to be signed by the governor, which will ban platforms like Kalshi from operating. Kalshi has filed a federal lawsuit, arguing that its contracts are derivatives. The CFTC chairman stated that the agency will defend its regulatory authority.
GateNews14h ago
