Bipartisan Bill Seeks To Shield Blockchain Developers From Criminal Liability

DEFI-5,1%
  • New bill protects non-custodial developers from unfair prosecution.
  • Clarifies that Section 1960 applies only to those who control customer funds.
  • Bill draws a line between coders and money transmitters.
  • Backers say it safeguards U.S. crypto innovation.

US lawmakers have introduced the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026 to protect software developers from criminal prosecution. The measure, which aims to draw a boundary between entities that control user funds and those who merely write code, includes a provision that the DeFi sector has long pressed for to be part of the CLARITY Act

Drawing the Line Between Developers and Money Transmitters

On Friday, Reps. Scott Fitzgerald, Zoe Lofgren, and Ben Cline introduced the novel bill to block the prosecution of software developers who write code, as opposed to those who hold and transmit customers’ assets. The legislation clarifies that Section 1960 of the Criminal Code only applies to developers who handle funds

It applies to individuals or entities that transfer funds on behalf of others without proper state licenses or that fail to comply with federal registration requirements, including anti-money-laundering (AML) obligations. The law is commonly used to prosecute illegal money transmission schemes, including those involving digital assets, when operators are found to be moving or controlling customer funds without authorization.

ADVERTISEMENTSection 1960 refers to 18 U.S.C. § 1960 of the federal criminal code, which classifies as criminal activity the operation of unlicensed money transmitting businesses. It makes it unlawful for anyone or any entity to transfer funds for others without the requisite state licenses and federal compliance requirements, including anti-money-laundering (AML) provisions

Authorities often invoke the provision to pursue unlawful money transmission schemes, including crypto-related cases, where individuals are accused of holding or moving customer funds without regulatory clearance.

The bill presents regulatory clarity to the debate of whether non-custodial developers should be prosecuted the same way as custodial actors. It aligns with the initial intent of Section 1960 and represents Congressional and judicial consensus on the matter

ADVERTISEMENT## Protecting Innovation While Targeting Criminal Activity

While section 1960 originally applied to custodial developers, the cases of Tornado Cash and Samourai Wallet, where the law was applied to developers who wrote only code, necessitated the clear boundaries the bill establishes.

“For too long,” said Rep. Cline, “federal overreach has blurred the line between bad actors and the innovators building next-generation technology.”

“This bipartisan bill restores needed clarity by protecting developers who don’t control customer funds, while ensuring law enforcement can continue to target real criminals. I’m proud to support this effort to keep America the global leader in blockchain innovation.”

Over the past few years, experts raised an alarm over a massive outflow of American developers to other jurisdictions due to the fear of unfair prosecution. Once the new legislation gets passed, it will ensure the protection of these non-custodial developers, and by extension, secure the future of American leadership in the digital asset space.

ADVERTISEMENT

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Korea's National Tax Service launches virtual asset transaction tracking system construction with a budget of 3 billion KRW, taxing from 2027 onwards

The Korea National Tax Service is building a tracking system for cryptocurrency investment income, which will officially start taxing in 2027. The system will analyze transaction data, identify tax evasion behaviors, and is expected to go live within the year, incorporating artificial intelligence technology for abnormal transaction analysis. The tax standard applies a 22% rate to the portion of annual earnings exceeding 2.5 million Korean won.

GateNews41m ago

Kalshi Files Lawsuit Against Iowa Regulators

Kalshi has sued Iowa regulators, claiming that they may impose restrictions on its federally regulated sports-related event contracts, risking enforcement action against the platform. This legal battle underscores the tension between state and federal oversight of prediction markets.

TodayqNews54m ago

Refuse to risk lives! U.S. lawmakers introduce legislation banning market prediction wars & death bets

U.S. Senator Adam Schiff has introduced the "Death Betting Act," which fully bans contracts related to terrorism, war, and death in prediction markets. The aim is to eliminate CFTC's regulatory flexibility and prevent national security risks. This move is a direct challenge to the recent relaxation of regulation by the CFTC and emphasizes that such bets will facilitate insider profits and are detrimental to public interest. This bill and similar actions are intended to respond to the ethical controversies sparked by prediction markets.

CryptoCity1h ago

New Zealand Financial Markets Authority rules that the stablecoin NZDD is not a financial product

The New Zealand Financial Markets Authority has ruled that the stablecoin NZDD, pegged to the New Zealand dollar, does not qualify as a financial product. This determination stems from its fintech sandbox pilot, emphasizing that NZDD does not have an investment nature. This ruling provides clarity for stablecoin regulation but is limited to specific versions of NZDD.

GateNews1h ago

New Zealand regulatory stance: NZDD stablecoin is not classified as a financial product, marking a key change in the crypto regulatory framework

New Zealand's financial regulatory authority FMA confirms that the NZDD stablecoin pegged to the New Zealand dollar is not a financial product, marking a gradual clarification in digital asset regulation. The FMA states that NZDD does not generate income and does not meet the definition of debt securities. This decision provides a legal classification for stablecoins and promotes the expansion of fintech sandbox projects, which is expected to foster market development.

GateNews1h ago

No more talking past each other! The SEC and CFTC sign a historic partnership, cryptocurrency regulation will be coordinated and integrated

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have signed a historic memorandum of understanding, ending jurisdiction disputes over digital assets and moving towards a unified and harmonized regulatory framework. This move aims to streamline regulatory processes, reduce compliance costs, and promote transparent rules and innovation. The two agencies have established the "Joint Harmonization Initiative," planning to develop regulatory strategies based on the principle of the minimum effective dose, integrating joint review mechanisms into daily operations to strengthen the United States' competitiveness in the global digital asset market.

CryptoCity1h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments