2025-12-30 21:24:08

In the most recent quarter, specialized creator DAO tools have begun to play a key role. Coinvise has built an integrated system from token issuance to community treasury management, Mirror's crowdfunding feature has raised $150 million for over 2,000 creative projects, and PartyBid enables communities to jointly participate in NFT auctions — these are not just simple tools, but infrastructure that changes the way creators fundraise and organize.

Data shows that successful creator DAOs on average manage a fund pool of $500,000. How is this money used? Through proposal voting. Content direction, partners, profit sharing—all are decided collectively by DAO members. What's more interesting is that the governance participation rate averages 35% — this number may not seem high, but compared to shareholder voting in traditional companies, it is already quite substantial.

However, behind these opportunities are also practical constraints. A new mode of creative production is taking shape, but the legal framework and boundaries of responsibility are not yet clear, which could become a bottleneck for large-scale adoption.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainWorker

· 9h ago

A vault worth $500,000, with a 35% participation rate... sounds good, but the legal issues really need to be resolved, or it could be a ticking time bomb. Mirror's $150 million looks very attractive, but what's the current status? Feels like the hype has cooled down. Still the same point, decentralized governance sounds great, but who is responsible if something goes wrong? I favor the joint bidding approach like PartyBid; it's more reliable than going solo. To put it simply, all the tools are ready, just waiting for the legal framework to catch up. The future of creator DAOs still depends on whether they can pass legal scrutiny... right now, it's too vague.

View OriginalReply0

notSatoshi1971

· 9h ago

Mirroring 150 million is indeed impressive, but a 35% governance rate is still too low, to be honest.

View OriginalReply0

ChainDoctor

· 9h ago

A vault of 500,000 USD, a 35% voting rate, sounds pretty good, but the legal hurdle still needs to be overcome. Mirror's 150 million USD is indeed impressive, but how many creator DAOs have actually survived until now? Governance participation rates are higher than shareholder votes, but the problem is DAO members also tend to leave quickly. Coinvise's system looks complete, but the key is having genuine creators willing to put real money on the line. The legal framework is unclear, and those leveraging now need to act quickly.

View OriginalReply0

AllInAlice

· 9h ago

Can a 35% governance participation rate really be bragged about? How much is the traditional shareholder voting turnout?

View OriginalReply0

ShitcoinConnoisseur

· 9h ago

$500,000 governance participation is only 35%? Still have to rely on whales for decision-making.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityLurker

· 9h ago

$500,000 still depends on voting decisions, this level of democracy is really laughable and crying --- The figure of 1.5 billion in Mirror is eye-catching, but I don't know how many projects are still alive now --- A 35% participation rate is quite good in a DAO, but I still think most people are just voting machines --- The legal framework is really a hard flaw, dare to set the rules earlier --- PartyBid sounds good, but I don't want to deal with risk calculations --- Creator DAO sounds great, but it will definitely be troublesome when it comes to profit sharing --- No matter how flashy these infrastructures are, without legal cover, they are just castles in the air

View OriginalReply0

RektButSmiling

· 9h ago

A funding pool of 500,000 USD sounds good, but a 35% participation rate... to put it simply, most people are still just messing around 🤔 The legal aspect will eventually be exposed; right now, it's just operating in legal gray areas. I didn't expect Mirror to raise 150 million; it seems creators are really starving. I need to study the Coinvise system; it feels like there's something there. Wait, how can the DAO governance participation rate of 35% be higher than shareholder voting... Is the participation rate in shareholder voting that low? This wave truly signifies the emergence of infrastructure, but the nightmare of subsequent regulation has just begun. The democratization of creator financing sounds great, but how will it actually play out in reality? A 500,000 USD average pool, most are probably lower; the data might be a bit inflated.

View OriginalReply0