On February 14, Kevin O’Leary won a default judgment in a defamation case against Ben “BitBoy” Armstrong in the Southern District of Florida Federal Court, receiving a total award of $2.8 million. The court found that the defendant’s posting of “malicious” false accusations and private information on social media constituted serious defamation and punitive damages.
The ruling awarded O’Leary $750,000 in emotional distress damages, $78,000 in reputation damages, and an additional $2 million in punitive damages. The judge noted that as a public figure engaged in media and business collaborations, damage to O’Leary’s reputation would directly impact his performance invitations and business relationships. Expert testimony, based on the viewership of the relevant posts, the size of the affected audience, and repair costs, estimated the reputation loss at $78,000.
The dispute originated from multiple posts made by Armstrong in March 2025, accusing O’Leary of involvement in a fatal boat accident in 2019, and publicly sharing his private phone number in one post, urging fans to “call the murderer in real life.” The court found that O’Leary was only a passenger at the time and was not prosecuted; his wife was also declared innocent after the trial. The accident investigation indicated that another boat had no lights at the time. After the phone number was leaked, O’Leary received hundreds of calls, leading to an annual security expense of approximately $200,000 and changes to his travel and work routines for safety reasons.
Procedurally, O’Leary filed suit on March 26, 2025; service was completed by March 28. Armstrong repeatedly failed to respond within the deadline, despite court extensions and clear warnings, and did not submit a response. The clerk entered a default on May 6. A damages hearing was held on October 30, with Armstrong still absent. He later sought to dismiss the case citing detention and bipolar disorder, but the court found he had been properly notified, delayed nearly a year, and was harming the plaintiff’s interests, and thus dismissed the motion.
This case serves as a warning: spreading false accusations and “doxxing” others on social media can lead to high damages and long-term legal consequences. The parties involved include Kevin O’Leary, Ben “BitBoy” Armstrong, and O’Leary’s public role as an investor on “Shark Tank.”
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
DeFi High-Yield Scam Triggers Corporate Crisis! Former CFO Sentenced to 2 Years for Embezzling 35 Million
Former Chief Financial Officer Shetty of a private software company in Washington State was sentenced to two years in prison for secretly embezzling $35 million of company funds to invest in high-risk DeFi projects. His actions led to approximately 60 employees losing their jobs and caused nearly all funds to evaporate due to the Terra collapse. The court ordered Shetty to compensate the company for the losses and to undergo three years of supervision. This incident highlights the need for strengthened regulation of crypto investments.
MarketWhisper5m ago
Hamini's death, Kalshi cited the "Death Exemption Clause" to refuse compensation, facing a class-action lawsuit
The prediction market platform Kalshi is facing a class-action lawsuit over contracts related to Hamini's resignation. The plaintiffs allege that the platform refused to pay $54 million in damages using a "death exemption" clause. Mansour stated that the platform has not changed its terms and has compensated users for their losses, but the plaintiffs are dissatisfied with the reimbursement amount. This case has raised concerns about prediction market rules and fulfillment risks.
ChainNewsAbmedia1h ago
A certain CEX and its founders won the lawsuit filed by victims of a terrorist organization attack, and the court dismissed the case.
Manhattan judge dismissed the lawsuit filed by 535 plaintiffs against a cryptocurrency trading platform and its founders, accusing them of funding terrorist organizations. The judge ruled that the plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove that the defendants intentionally engaged in terrorist activities, and the allegations could not be sustained.
GateNews1h ago
FATF warns that stablecoins account for the majority of illegal cryptocurrency activities
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) reports that stablecoins dominate illegal cryptocurrency activities, urging stricter oversight of issuers. In 2024, $51 billion in illicit stablecoin transactions related to fraud and money laundering is projected, highlighting significant concerns for global financial integrity.
TapChiBitcoin1h ago
The U.S. Treasury Department recognizes mixers as having legitimate privacy uses but still recommends Congress establish a freezing law to control suspicious crypto assets.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury recently acknowledged for the first time in a report the legitimate privacy uses of cryptocurrency mixers and suggested that Congress establish a "Freezing Law" to temporarily freeze suspicious digital assets. The report states that legitimate users can utilize these tools to protect financial privacy, but also expresses concerns about money laundering risks associated with non-custodial mixers. The debate over privacy issues continues, and the legal responsibilities of open-source tool developers remain unclear.
動區BlockTempo2h ago
Is the U.S. planning to introduce a crypto "Freezing Law" to combat money laundering? The Treasury Department recommends granting platforms the authority to freeze suspicious funds.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury recommends that Congress introduce the "Freeze Act," granting crypto platforms the authority to temporarily freeze suspected illegal funds during investigations to strengthen efforts against digital asset fraud and money laundering. The proposal aims to provide legal grounds for financial institutions to voluntarily freeze assets related to suspicious transactions during investigations. Despite legal controversies and transparency issues, it is seen as an important tool in combating crypto crime.
GateNews2h ago
